Reliability evaluation of a new protective device scheme for the 34.5kV power distribution feeder circuit

M. Pacis, J. M. Coronel, P. K. Lampitoc, C. A. Serrano, P. M. Tañarte
{"title":"Reliability evaluation of a new protective device scheme for the 34.5kV power distribution feeder circuit","authors":"M. Pacis, J. M. Coronel, P. K. Lampitoc, C. A. Serrano, P. M. Tañarte","doi":"10.1109/HNICEM.2017.8269542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis focuses on improving the protection and performance of sample Radial Power Distribution Circuit in Manila. SAIFI, SAIDI, CAIDI, ASUI, ASAI and ASCI were the commonly used reliability indices of distribution utility companies were also used in this study. The data to be used are legitimate and accurate from the distribution utility company responsible in the area. Historical Assessment were used as basis for the Predictive Assessment of the circuit to see its response to the different protective schemes applied to it. The study will consider seven (7) cases which are of different protective schemes. Through simulation and thorough study, it is found that case 3 wherein all the laterals were fused is the best protective scheme compared to the other protective schemes studied considering the performance it delivers and the cost of its installation as well as the cost gained from it. Microsoft Excel is the primary tool for doing simulation in this study. ETAP which is a very well known power system simulator was used in this thesis for comparative purposes and additional integrity to the results.","PeriodicalId":104407,"journal":{"name":"2017IEEE 9th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM)","volume":"207 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017IEEE 9th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment and Management (HNICEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HNICEM.2017.8269542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thesis focuses on improving the protection and performance of sample Radial Power Distribution Circuit in Manila. SAIFI, SAIDI, CAIDI, ASUI, ASAI and ASCI were the commonly used reliability indices of distribution utility companies were also used in this study. The data to be used are legitimate and accurate from the distribution utility company responsible in the area. Historical Assessment were used as basis for the Predictive Assessment of the circuit to see its response to the different protective schemes applied to it. The study will consider seven (7) cases which are of different protective schemes. Through simulation and thorough study, it is found that case 3 wherein all the laterals were fused is the best protective scheme compared to the other protective schemes studied considering the performance it delivers and the cost of its installation as well as the cost gained from it. Microsoft Excel is the primary tool for doing simulation in this study. ETAP which is a very well known power system simulator was used in this thesis for comparative purposes and additional integrity to the results.
34.5kV配电馈线保护装置新方案可靠性评价
本文主要研究如何提高马尼拉市样本径向配电电路的保护和性能。SAIFI、SAIDI、CAIDI、ASUI、ASAI和ASCI是配电公用事业公司常用的可靠性指标。要使用的数据是合法和准确的,来自负责该地区的配电公用事业公司。历史评估被用作电路预测评估的基础,以了解其对应用于其的不同保护方案的响应。这项研究将考虑七种不同的保护方案。通过模拟和深入研究,综合考虑其性能、安装成本和所获得的成本,发现所有分支段融合的情况3是与所研究的其他保护方案相比最好的保护方案。Microsoft Excel是本研究中进行模拟的主要工具。为了比较和提高结果的完整性,本文使用了一个非常有名的电力系统模拟器ETAP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信