Dialogue between two Chief Worldview Systems on Quantized Orbit Distances as Astrophysics Phenomena

V. Christianto
{"title":"Dialogue between two Chief Worldview Systems on Quantized Orbit Distances as Astrophysics Phenomena","authors":"V. Christianto","doi":"10.5958/2320-3218.2021.00018.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a follow-up to our previous paper, suggesting going toward quantum geophysics and quantum astrophysics. Recently, a colleague asks : “1. What is the quantum interpretation of the astrophysics? 2. What is the quantum explanation of the orbital distances?” This short review paper will discusses two chief worldview systems on such quantized orbit distances as a phenomenon in astrophysics and astronomy. We will discuss in specific way: scale relativity approach of Laurent Nottale and our own approach. This short review is also intended as a response to M. Pitkanen’s recent article. We hope this discussion will be found interesting. Introduction From time to time, cosmology and stargazing disclosures have opened our eyes that the universe is considerably more entangled than what it showed up in 100-200 years earlier. Additionally, thinking about old-fashioned Greek realist speculations, for instance, hydor model (Thales) and streaming fluid model (Heracleitus) it seems, by all accounts, to be at this 1 The title above is an adaptation to Galilei’s book: Dialogue concerning two chief world systems. 2 M. Pitkanen. Three Alternative Generalizations of Nottale’s Hypothesis in the TGD framework. Prespacetime Journal, June 2021, Volume 12, Issue 2.","PeriodicalId":445078,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Pure & Applied Sciences- Physics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Pure & Applied Sciences- Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5958/2320-3218.2021.00018.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a follow-up to our previous paper, suggesting going toward quantum geophysics and quantum astrophysics. Recently, a colleague asks : “1. What is the quantum interpretation of the astrophysics? 2. What is the quantum explanation of the orbital distances?” This short review paper will discusses two chief worldview systems on such quantized orbit distances as a phenomenon in astrophysics and astronomy. We will discuss in specific way: scale relativity approach of Laurent Nottale and our own approach. This short review is also intended as a response to M. Pitkanen’s recent article. We hope this discussion will be found interesting. Introduction From time to time, cosmology and stargazing disclosures have opened our eyes that the universe is considerably more entangled than what it showed up in 100-200 years earlier. Additionally, thinking about old-fashioned Greek realist speculations, for instance, hydor model (Thales) and streaming fluid model (Heracleitus) it seems, by all accounts, to be at this 1 The title above is an adaptation to Galilei’s book: Dialogue concerning two chief world systems. 2 M. Pitkanen. Three Alternative Generalizations of Nottale’s Hypothesis in the TGD framework. Prespacetime Journal, June 2021, Volume 12, Issue 2.
两种主要世界观体系关于量子化轨道距离作为天体物理现象的对话
这是我们上一篇论文的后续,建议朝着量子地球物理学和量子天体物理学的方向发展。最近,一位同事问道:“1。天体物理学的量子解释是什么?2. 轨道距离的量子解释是什么?”这篇简短的评论文章将讨论两种主要的世界观体系,这些世界观体系将量子化轨道距离作为天体物理学和天文学中的一种现象。我们将具体讨论:Laurent Nottale的尺度相对论方法和我们自己的方法。这篇简短的评论也是为了回应皮特卡宁最近的一篇文章。我们希望大家对这次讨论感兴趣。宇宙学和观星术不时地让我们看到,宇宙比它在100-200年前所表现出来的要复杂得多。此外,考虑到老式的希腊现实主义的推测,例如,水合模型(泰勒斯)和流动流体模型(赫拉克利特),似乎,从所有的说法来看,都是这样的1上面的标题是对伽利莱的书的改编:关于两个主要世界体系的对话。2 .皮特卡宁先生。TGD框架下Nottale假说的三种可选推广。《时空前瞻杂志》,2021年6月,第12卷第2期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信