Sustainable regulation as driver for transformation in fashion industry

Elena Pucci, Maria Claudia Coppola
{"title":"Sustainable regulation as driver for transformation in fashion industry","authors":"Elena Pucci, Maria Claudia Coppola","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The world is changing incrementally, exacerbating planetary boundaries\n (Rockström et al., 2009) and, as such, current lifestyles. Environmental\n pollution is gaining problematic levels, and the textile industry is\n considered one of the main culprits. The textile supply chain creates\n different types of waste and scrap that belong not only to the semi-finished\n product but also to the goods needed in the production stages (Nayak, R.\n 2019).The textile production process is known to consume resources, once\n considered unlimited, such as 'water, which now needs to be totally\n recovered and treated, fuel from fossil resources and a variety of chemicals\n on a large scale. Industry estimates show that more than 35 percent of\n chemicals released into the environment are the result of various textile\n treatment and dyeing processes (Thiry 2011). In the Italian landscape there\n are many examples of companies operating in the textile sector, where we\n find the closed cycle of production wastewater.The urgency of transitioning\n to circular and sustainable models has led governments to dwell on the role\n of textile companies with regard to sustainability, noting that they do not\n seem to be reforming at a pace and scale that would considerably combat\n environmental and climate change. The question that arises concerns the\n emergence of a number of new regulatory proposals and how they will impact\n within textile companies. Although most of the newer proposals are still a\n long way from becoming law, some regulations require textile companies to\n review the way they produce and communicate the nature of their products,\n involving EU manufacturers, importers, and retailers in the round.As part of\n the Circular Economy Action Plan, in March 2022, the EU published the\n \"Sustainable Textiles Strategy 2030,\" which focuses on circularity of\n textiles and making brands responsible for waste sent to landfills (Digital\n Agenda Eu. 2022) and aims to make textiles more durable, repairable,\n reusable and recyclable. It also pledges to combat fast fashion and unsold\n textiles and ensure that they are produced with respect for social\n rights.The European Commission has made its regulatory proposals official,\n including the proposed Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, or\n Espr, which establishes a framework for improving product circularity.Thus,\n the role of design becomes critical for a more rational use of resources in\n the development of new products (Thorpe, 2007; Fletcher & Grose, 2012;\n Fletcher, 2014), which should be designed in a way that reduces waste,\n scrap, pollutants, and pollution, reaching the zero-waste goal. The\n treatment of this issue poses two different studies from the outset because\n the complexities between waste and waste generation in pre-consumption and\n post-consumption are different.If it is true that rules and standards are\n the lever of transformation the designer will have to come up with a new\n design process in compliance with the standard but producing innovation and\n making sustainability a tangible value in the value chain of the\n semi-finished or finished product.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The world is changing incrementally, exacerbating planetary boundaries (Rockström et al., 2009) and, as such, current lifestyles. Environmental pollution is gaining problematic levels, and the textile industry is considered one of the main culprits. The textile supply chain creates different types of waste and scrap that belong not only to the semi-finished product but also to the goods needed in the production stages (Nayak, R. 2019).The textile production process is known to consume resources, once considered unlimited, such as 'water, which now needs to be totally recovered and treated, fuel from fossil resources and a variety of chemicals on a large scale. Industry estimates show that more than 35 percent of chemicals released into the environment are the result of various textile treatment and dyeing processes (Thiry 2011). In the Italian landscape there are many examples of companies operating in the textile sector, where we find the closed cycle of production wastewater.The urgency of transitioning to circular and sustainable models has led governments to dwell on the role of textile companies with regard to sustainability, noting that they do not seem to be reforming at a pace and scale that would considerably combat environmental and climate change. The question that arises concerns the emergence of a number of new regulatory proposals and how they will impact within textile companies. Although most of the newer proposals are still a long way from becoming law, some regulations require textile companies to review the way they produce and communicate the nature of their products, involving EU manufacturers, importers, and retailers in the round.As part of the Circular Economy Action Plan, in March 2022, the EU published the "Sustainable Textiles Strategy 2030," which focuses on circularity of textiles and making brands responsible for waste sent to landfills (Digital Agenda Eu. 2022) and aims to make textiles more durable, repairable, reusable and recyclable. It also pledges to combat fast fashion and unsold textiles and ensure that they are produced with respect for social rights.The European Commission has made its regulatory proposals official, including the proposed Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation, or Espr, which establishes a framework for improving product circularity.Thus, the role of design becomes critical for a more rational use of resources in the development of new products (Thorpe, 2007; Fletcher & Grose, 2012; Fletcher, 2014), which should be designed in a way that reduces waste, scrap, pollutants, and pollution, reaching the zero-waste goal. The treatment of this issue poses two different studies from the outset because the complexities between waste and waste generation in pre-consumption and post-consumption are different.If it is true that rules and standards are the lever of transformation the designer will have to come up with a new design process in compliance with the standard but producing innovation and making sustainability a tangible value in the value chain of the semi-finished or finished product.
可持续监管是时尚产业转型的驱动力
世界正在逐渐变化,加剧了地球的边界(Rockström等人,2009年),因此,目前的生活方式。环境污染问题日益严重,纺织业被认为是罪魁祸首之一。纺织供应链产生不同类型的废物和废料,这些废物和废料不仅属于半成品,而且属于生产阶段所需的货物(Nayak, R. 2019)。众所周知,纺织生产过程消耗的资源曾经被认为是无限的,比如现在需要完全回收和处理的水,化石资源中的燃料和各种化学物质。行业估计表明,释放到环境中的化学物质中有35%以上是各种纺织品处理和染色过程的结果(Thiry 2011)。在意大利,有许多纺织行业的公司,在那里我们发现了生产废水的封闭循环。向循环和可持续模式过渡的紧迫性促使各国政府关注纺织企业在可持续发展方面的作用,并注意到它们的改革速度和规模似乎无法显著应对环境和气候变化。由此产生的问题是,一些新的监管提案的出现,以及它们将如何影响纺织企业。虽然大多数新提案离成为法律还有很长的路要走,但一些法规要求纺织公司审查其生产方式并传达其产品的性质,涉及欧盟制造商,进口商和零售商。作为循环经济行动计划的一部分,欧盟于2022年3月发布了“2030年可持续纺织品战略”,该战略侧重于纺织品的循环性,并使品牌对送往垃圾填埋场的废物负责(欧盟数字议程2022),旨在使纺织品更耐用、可修复、可重复使用和可回收。它还承诺打击快时尚和未售出的纺织品,并确保它们的生产尊重社会权利。欧盟委员会已经正式提出了监管建议,包括拟议的可持续产品生态设计法规,或Espr,它建立了一个改善产品循环的框架。因此,设计的作用对于新产品开发中更合理地利用资源变得至关重要(Thorpe, 2007;Fletcher & grosse, 2012;Fletcher, 2014),其设计应以减少废物,废料,污染物和污染的方式,达到零废物的目标。对这个问题的处理从一开始就提出了两种不同的研究,因为消费前和消费后的废物和废物产生之间的复杂性是不同的。如果规则和标准真的是转型的杠杆,那么设计师将不得不提出一个符合标准的新设计过程,但要产生创新,并使可持续性成为半成品或成品价值链中的有形价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信