ANOTASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016

A. Sanjaya
{"title":"ANOTASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 20/PUU-XIV/2016","authors":"A. Sanjaya","doi":"10.37303/magister.v12i1.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The status of the state of law attached to the state of Indonesia carries juridical implications that absolutely must be upheld. Every government and state life must rely on the rule of law.  Law enforcement becomes a vehicle for the state to ensure the establishment of the law without neglecting human rights protections  that serve as a counterweight to state power from the possibility of arbitrariness. Every citizen has the right to privacy (privacy rights) that must be protected by the state.  The restoration of the right to privacy should be given strict arrangements in the law including the implications of violations of privacy rights related to whether or not it can be used as evidence in legal proceedings. Such a regulation is absolutely necessary, considering that the law will always be left behind with the development of society, especially the rigid state law demanding the role of judicial institutions in this context is the Constitutional Court to be present to provide solutions for the justice-seeking community through its authority and role as a constitutional guard (the guardian of the constitution), in order to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of citizens.  The formulation of the issue raised is (1) Is the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20 / PUU-XIV / 2016 appropriate , (2) What is the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 when viewed from the perspective of Religiousity of Science?  This type of research uses juridical-normative methods with a conceptual approach. Results obtained (1) Putusan MK No.  20/PUU-XIV/2016 when viewed from the perspective of State Theory of Law, Theory of Legal Certainty, Theory of Proof, and Hemeneutics of law is very appropriate, (2) The conclusion of MK Number 20 /PUU-XIV/2016 in the perspective of religiousity of science has reflected the elaboration of religious values derived from the revelation of Allah SWT. Keywords: MK’s verdict, evidence, religiousity of science.","PeriodicalId":441760,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37303/magister.v12i1.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The status of the state of law attached to the state of Indonesia carries juridical implications that absolutely must be upheld. Every government and state life must rely on the rule of law.  Law enforcement becomes a vehicle for the state to ensure the establishment of the law without neglecting human rights protections  that serve as a counterweight to state power from the possibility of arbitrariness. Every citizen has the right to privacy (privacy rights) that must be protected by the state.  The restoration of the right to privacy should be given strict arrangements in the law including the implications of violations of privacy rights related to whether or not it can be used as evidence in legal proceedings. Such a regulation is absolutely necessary, considering that the law will always be left behind with the development of society, especially the rigid state law demanding the role of judicial institutions in this context is the Constitutional Court to be present to provide solutions for the justice-seeking community through its authority and role as a constitutional guard (the guardian of the constitution), in order to ensure the protection of the constitutional rights of citizens.  The formulation of the issue raised is (1) Is the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 20 / PUU-XIV / 2016 appropriate , (2) What is the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 when viewed from the perspective of Religiousity of Science?  This type of research uses juridical-normative methods with a conceptual approach. Results obtained (1) Putusan MK No.  20/PUU-XIV/2016 when viewed from the perspective of State Theory of Law, Theory of Legal Certainty, Theory of Proof, and Hemeneutics of law is very appropriate, (2) The conclusion of MK Number 20 /PUU-XIV/2016 in the perspective of religiousity of science has reflected the elaboration of religious values derived from the revelation of Allah SWT. Keywords: MK’s verdict, evidence, religiousity of science.
宪法法院判决第20号/PUU-XIV/2016号
法律国家附属于印度尼西亚国家的地位具有绝对必须维护的法律影响。任何一个政府和国家的生活都必须依靠法治。执法成为国家在不忽视人权保护的情况下确保法律确立的工具,人权保护是一种制衡国家权力的工具,可以防止专制的可能性。每个公民都有隐私权(隐私权),必须受到国家的保护。隐私权的恢复应在法律上作出严格的安排,包括侵犯隐私权所涉问题与能否在法律诉讼中作为证据有关。这样的规定是绝对必要的,因为法律总是会随着社会的发展而落后,特别是僵化的国家法律要求司法机构在这种情况下的作用是宪法法院通过其权威和宪法卫士(宪法守护者)的角色为寻求正义的社会提供解决方案,以确保对公民宪法权利的保护。提出问题的提法是:(1)第20/PUU-XIV/2016号宪法法院的判决是否恰当;(2)从科学的宗教性的角度来看,第20/PUU-XIV/2016号宪法法院的判决是什么?这种类型的研究使用概念方法的司法规范方法。结果表明:(1)Putusan MK No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016从法律的国家理论、法律确定性理论、证明理论和法律的Hemeneutics的角度来看是非常恰当的;(2)MK No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016从科学的宗教性的角度来看,其结论反映了源自安拉启示的宗教价值的阐述。关键词:MK判决,证据,科学宗教性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信