PERBANDINGAN PERKERASAN KAKU DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR BERDASARKAN BIAYA DAN UMUR RENCANA (STUDI KASUS LOT-3 JEMBATAN KRETEK 2 BANTUL)

Muhammad Nauval Ibrahim, A. Narendra
{"title":"PERBANDINGAN PERKERASAN KAKU DAN PERKERASAN LENTUR BERDASARKAN BIAYA DAN UMUR RENCANA (STUDI KASUS LOT-3 JEMBATAN KRETEK 2 BANTUL)","authors":"Muhammad Nauval Ibrahim, A. Narendra","doi":"10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge is part of the Southern Cross Road (JJLS) Java Island. This bridge was built to connect the Samas–Kretek and Kretek–Parangtritis roads in Bantul Regency, which are separated from the Opak River. In this study, we will compare rigid pavement planning and flexible pavement at the LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge project site, guided by the “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”. Then the two pavements will be compared to get a more economical and long-lived pavement. Finally, based on data processing results, the flexible pavement is planned with a thickness of AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm, Aggregate Class A = 300 mm, and support layer = 100 mm. Meanwhile, for rigid pavement, cement concrete pavement with unreinforced joints is used with a concrete slab thickness = 300 mm, a thin concrete layer = 100 mm, and a drainage layer = 150 mm. From the analysis and calculation, the budget plan for flexible pavement is Rp. 15,382,772,000.00 with a design life of 20 years, while the rigid pavement is Rp. 18,093,230,000.00 with a design life of 40 years. So, rigid pavement is more economical because the price is 14.98% higher but has twice the design life.","PeriodicalId":414894,"journal":{"name":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i1.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The construction of LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge is part of the Southern Cross Road (JJLS) Java Island. This bridge was built to connect the Samas–Kretek and Kretek–Parangtritis roads in Bantul Regency, which are separated from the Opak River. In this study, we will compare rigid pavement planning and flexible pavement at the LOT-3 Kretek 2 Bridge project site, guided by the “Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”. Then the two pavements will be compared to get a more economical and long-lived pavement. Finally, based on data processing results, the flexible pavement is planned with a thickness of AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm, Aggregate Class A = 300 mm, and support layer = 100 mm. Meanwhile, for rigid pavement, cement concrete pavement with unreinforced joints is used with a concrete slab thickness = 300 mm, a thin concrete layer = 100 mm, and a drainage layer = 150 mm. From the analysis and calculation, the budget plan for flexible pavement is Rp. 15,382,772,000.00 with a design life of 20 years, while the rigid pavement is Rp. 18,093,230,000.00 with a design life of 40 years. So, rigid pavement is more economical because the price is 14.98% higher but has twice the design life.
基于成本和年龄的刚性和弹性弹性比较(帮助KRETEK - 2案例研究)
LOT-3 Kretek 2桥的建设是爪哇岛南十字路(JJLS)的一部分。这座桥是为了连接班图尔县的Samas-Kretek和Kretek-Parangtritis道路而建造的,这两条道路与奥帕克河分开。在本研究中,我们将在“Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017 Bina Marga”的指导下,比较LOT-3 Kretek 2桥项目现场的刚性路面规划和柔性路面规划。然后将两种路面进行比较,以获得更经济、更长寿的路面。最后,根据数据处理结果,规划柔性路面厚度AC-WC = 40 mm, AC-BC = 60 mm, AC-Base = 160 mm,骨料a级= 300 mm,支撑层= 100 mm。刚性路面采用无配筋接缝水泥混凝土路面,混凝土板厚度300mm,薄混凝土层厚度100mm,排水层厚度150mm。通过分析计算,柔性路面的预算方案为Rp. 15,382,772,000.00,设计寿命为20年;刚性路面的预算方案为Rp. 18,093,230,000 0.00,设计寿命为40年。因此,刚性路面价格高出14.98%,但使用寿命是设计寿命的两倍,更加经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信