Getting past Knowledge Management

J. Smith
{"title":"Getting past Knowledge Management","authors":"J. Smith","doi":"10.1109/UTEMC.2006.5236197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Not long ago, we all saluted the need for solid Knowledge Management, believing it to be key in IP development, organizational knowledge retention, team synergies, and more. Things have not changed, but success stories are few in the KM domain. We are at a point where many are wary at the mention of a KM initiative... But perhaps we were our own worst enemy. Many tool vendors rushed to add ldquoknowledge managementrdquo to their product feature set, and our industry, being so responsive to hype and at the same time critically focused on ROI, has perhaps grown disillusioned from unmet promises. But KM still holds opportunity... though we might need to be careful in how we pitch it now. Tools and KM thinking have evolved. This paper reviews problems we have had, possible solutions, and hopefully also adds some new ideas to the mix. The paper also proposes an iterative path for solid KM in a medium sized technical organization.","PeriodicalId":440551,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE/UT Engineering Management Conference","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE/UT Engineering Management Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UTEMC.2006.5236197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Not long ago, we all saluted the need for solid Knowledge Management, believing it to be key in IP development, organizational knowledge retention, team synergies, and more. Things have not changed, but success stories are few in the KM domain. We are at a point where many are wary at the mention of a KM initiative... But perhaps we were our own worst enemy. Many tool vendors rushed to add ldquoknowledge managementrdquo to their product feature set, and our industry, being so responsive to hype and at the same time critically focused on ROI, has perhaps grown disillusioned from unmet promises. But KM still holds opportunity... though we might need to be careful in how we pitch it now. Tools and KM thinking have evolved. This paper reviews problems we have had, possible solutions, and hopefully also adds some new ideas to the mix. The paper also proposes an iterative path for solid KM in a medium sized technical organization.
超越知识管理
不久之前,我们都对坚实的知识管理的需求表示敬意,认为它是IP开发、组织知识保留、团队协作等方面的关键。事情没有改变,但是在知识管理领域成功的故事很少。我们正处于一个许多人对提及KM倡议持谨慎态度的时刻……但也许我们才是自己最大的敌人。许多工具供应商急于在他们的产品特性集中添加知识管理特性,而我们的行业,对炒作如此敏感,同时对ROI非常关注,可能已经从未实现的承诺中醒悟过来。但KM仍有机会…不过我们现在可能需要小心怎么推销它。工具和知识管理思想已经进化。本文回顾了我们遇到的问题和可能的解决方案,并希望能在此基础上增加一些新的想法。本文还提出了一个中型技术组织中实体知识管理的迭代路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信