International Consortium for Social Development: Members’ Views and Future Directions

M. Pawar, David Androff
{"title":"International Consortium for Social Development: Members’ Views and Future Directions","authors":"M. Pawar, David Androff","doi":"10.1177/25166026211020166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to discuss members’ views about the past and current engagements and activities of the International Consortium for Social Development (ICSD), and the future directions and strategies. A survey method was used to collect data from the ICSD members by using the Survey Monkey software. Quantitative data analysis was limited to frequency distributions, and responses to open-ended questions were analysed by using the qualitative content analysis method. Further, these results were presented in a workshop to generate ideas for the future directions and strategies. Overall, the analysis showed that the members had positive perceptions of the ICSD in terms of meeting their expectations and conduct of activities according to its mission. Some of the critical issues and the future directions for the ICSD included relooking at the leadership, finance, membership, social development vision and knowledge building by research and scholarly activities and networking, education/curriculum programmes, conferences and practice projects, and activism and increasing visibility. The article argues that addressing these and similar issues is critical in maintaining and sustaining consortiums/professional bodies such as the ICSD. The findings and analysis have implications for improving and strengthening the ICSD and similar professional bodies.","PeriodicalId":179996,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Community and Social Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Community and Social Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166026211020166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article aims to discuss members’ views about the past and current engagements and activities of the International Consortium for Social Development (ICSD), and the future directions and strategies. A survey method was used to collect data from the ICSD members by using the Survey Monkey software. Quantitative data analysis was limited to frequency distributions, and responses to open-ended questions were analysed by using the qualitative content analysis method. Further, these results were presented in a workshop to generate ideas for the future directions and strategies. Overall, the analysis showed that the members had positive perceptions of the ICSD in terms of meeting their expectations and conduct of activities according to its mission. Some of the critical issues and the future directions for the ICSD included relooking at the leadership, finance, membership, social development vision and knowledge building by research and scholarly activities and networking, education/curriculum programmes, conferences and practice projects, and activism and increasing visibility. The article argues that addressing these and similar issues is critical in maintaining and sustaining consortiums/professional bodies such as the ICSD. The findings and analysis have implications for improving and strengthening the ICSD and similar professional bodies.
国际社会发展联合会:成员的观点和未来方向
本文旨在讨论成员对国际社会发展联合会(ICSD)过去和现在的参与和活动以及未来的方向和战略的看法。采用问卷调查的方法,利用survey Monkey软件对ICSD会员进行数据收集。定量数据分析仅限于频率分布,对开放式问题的回答采用定性内容分析方法进行分析。此外,这些结果在一个研讨会上提出,以产生对未来方向和战略的想法。总的来说,分析表明,成员们对公务员制度委员会在满足他们的期望和根据其使命开展活动方面有积极的看法。国际可持续发展委员会的一些关键问题和未来方向包括重新审视领导、财务、成员、社会发展愿景和通过研究和学术活动和网络建立知识、教育/课程方案、会议和实践项目、行动主义和提高知名度。这篇文章认为,解决这些和类似的问题对于维持和维持像ICSD这样的联盟/专业机构至关重要。调查结果和分析对改进和加强公务员制度委员会和类似的专业机构具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信