On conceptualization of eventualities in Situation Management

G. Jakobson
{"title":"On conceptualization of eventualities in Situation Management","authors":"G. Jakobson","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2013.6523826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While there is an extensive body of research available in understanding the spatiotemporal eventualities of reality, we still face noticeable confusion in conceptualization of such basic notions like states, events, and actions. This is becoming increasingly evident when one has to deal with dynamic systems, especially systems that are subject of interest in situation awareness, situation control, and real-time decision support. The question is not only in the existence of terminological discrepancies across different domains, but more importantly, conceptual inconsistencies. In this paper we will review the metaphysical studies of states, events and actions prevailing in the modern philosophy and show what kind of new requirements are set for understanding these concepts in Situation Management. We will outline a conceptualization framework for future research in understanding the role and inter-dependencies among situations, events and actions.","PeriodicalId":243766,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2013.6523826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

While there is an extensive body of research available in understanding the spatiotemporal eventualities of reality, we still face noticeable confusion in conceptualization of such basic notions like states, events, and actions. This is becoming increasingly evident when one has to deal with dynamic systems, especially systems that are subject of interest in situation awareness, situation control, and real-time decision support. The question is not only in the existence of terminological discrepancies across different domains, but more importantly, conceptual inconsistencies. In this paper we will review the metaphysical studies of states, events and actions prevailing in the modern philosophy and show what kind of new requirements are set for understanding these concepts in Situation Management. We will outline a conceptualization framework for future research in understanding the role and inter-dependencies among situations, events and actions.
论态势管理中突发事件的概念化
虽然在理解现实的时空偶然性方面有广泛的研究,但我们仍然面临着诸如状态、事件和行动等基本概念概念化方面的明显混乱。当一个人必须处理动态系统时,尤其是对态势感知、态势控制和实时决策支持感兴趣的系统,这一点变得越来越明显。问题不仅在于不同领域之间存在术语差异,更重要的是概念上的不一致。在本文中,我们将回顾现代哲学中流行的关于状态、事件和行为的形而上学研究,并展示在情境管理中对这些概念的理解提出了什么样的新要求。我们将概述一个概念化框架,用于未来的研究,以理解情境、事件和行动之间的作用和相互依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信