Confronting selected difficulties associated with the enforcement of res judicata in South Africa with reference to Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66

Howard Chitimira
{"title":"Confronting selected difficulties associated with the enforcement of res judicata in South Africa with reference to Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66","authors":"Howard Chitimira","doi":"10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Nazzini R “Remedies at the seat and enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel and abuse of process in English law” (2014) 7(1) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 139 at 149-158; Sinai Y “Reconsidering res judicata: a comparative perspective” (2011) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 353 at 357-400; Wunsh B “Is issue estoppel part of our law?” (1990) 2 Stell LR 198 at 198-218; and Roodt C “Reflections on finality in arbitration” (2012) 45(2) De Jure 485 at 498-503. LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 Nazzini R “Remedies at the seat and enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel and abuse of process in English law” (2014) 7(1) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 139 at 149-158; Sinai Y “Reconsidering res judicata: a comparative perspective” (2011) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 353 at 357-400; Wunsh B “Is issue estoppel part of our law?” (1990) 2 Stell LR 198 at 198-218; and Roodt C “Reflections on finality in arbitration” (2012) 45(2) De Jure 485 at 498-503. LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT
面对与南非既判力执行相关的选定困难,参考Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66
[1]刘志强,“国际仲裁裁决在地救济与执行:既判力、禁言与程序滥用”,《国际仲裁研究》(2014)第7期。“对既判力的再思考:比较视角”(2011)21 Duke Journal of comparative and International Law,第353期,第357-400页;问题禁止反悔是我们法律的一部分吗?“(1990)2 Stell LR 198,第198-218页;陈志强,《关于仲裁终局性的思考》(2012)45(2)De Jure 485: 498-503。法治民主与发展法治民主与发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信