A Comment on the Formulation of an Aggregate Production Planning Problem

B. Phruksaphanrat, A. Ohsato, P. Yenradee
{"title":"A Comment on the Formulation of an Aggregate Production Planning Problem","authors":"B. Phruksaphanrat, A. Ohsato, P. Yenradee","doi":"10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventionally, a revenue function, a cost function and a profit function are selected to be the objective function for aggregate production planning (APP) problems. The theory of constraints (TOC) alternative consideration argues that instead of measuring by cost, factory should evaluate their performance by throughput. Even though, there are a lot of research works on formulations of APP problems, there has been no investigation, which formulation is the most appropriate for APP problems. In this research, the investigation of the formulation of existing APP problems is done. In order to clarify the difference of each objective function, a simple case study has been used to compare the performances of the APP problem with revenue, cost, and profit objective functions when resource constraints (limited processing time) are not included and included in the model. For the profit objective function, two formulations are also compared: profit objective function by TOC and profit objective function by linear programming. From the results, it can be shown that setting the objective function of an APP problem is very important because it may lead to a wrong decision in production planning","PeriodicalId":296028,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIS.2006.252270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Conventionally, a revenue function, a cost function and a profit function are selected to be the objective function for aggregate production planning (APP) problems. The theory of constraints (TOC) alternative consideration argues that instead of measuring by cost, factory should evaluate their performance by throughput. Even though, there are a lot of research works on formulations of APP problems, there has been no investigation, which formulation is the most appropriate for APP problems. In this research, the investigation of the formulation of existing APP problems is done. In order to clarify the difference of each objective function, a simple case study has been used to compare the performances of the APP problem with revenue, cost, and profit objective functions when resource constraints (limited processing time) are not included and included in the model. For the profit objective function, two formulations are also compared: profit objective function by TOC and profit objective function by linear programming. From the results, it can be shown that setting the objective function of an APP problem is very important because it may lead to a wrong decision in production planning
关于一个总体生产计划问题的提法的评论
通常,选择收益函数、成本函数和利润函数作为总生产计划问题的目标函数。约束替代考虑理论认为,工厂不应以成本来衡量绩效,而应以产量来衡量绩效。尽管对于APP问题的提法有很多的研究工作,但是对于APP问题,哪种提法是最合适的,还没有研究。在本研究中,对现有APP的制定问题进行了调查。为了澄清每个目标函数的区别,我们使用了一个简单的案例研究来比较在不包括资源约束(有限的处理时间)和模型中包含的情况下,APP问题与收入、成本和利润目标函数的表现。对于利润目标函数,比较了两种形式:TOC利润目标函数和线性规划利润目标函数。从结果可以看出,设置APP问题的目标函数是非常重要的,因为它可能导致生产计划中的错误决策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信