Living Wage Ordinances in California

M. Reich
{"title":"Living Wage Ordinances in California","authors":"M. Reich","doi":"10.1525/SCL.2003.2003.1.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Reich, Michael | Abstract: Living wage mandates legislate minimum hourly wages that are considerably higher than minimum wage rates. Since 1994 living wage ordinances have been passed and, in varying degrees, implemented in over ninety-five local governmental entities in the United States; among them are twenty-one California cities. The author presents a summary of the living wage ordinances in California, including their wage mandate levels and their coverage. He discusses how the minimum wage and the federal poverty standard have failed to keep up with increased living costs, especially in California’s cities, and reviews arguments for and against living wage policies. The author also surveys older academic studies on minimum wage and living wages and then discusses a new generation of research studies on the impacts of living wages. This new set of studies, which includes detailed analyses of Los Angeles and San Francisco, provides a more careful and complete understanding than was previously available. Using before-and-after surveys of employers and workers and more sophisticated methodology, they reveal that living wage policies increase pay for their intended beneficiaries without creating disemployment effects. Living wage policies also reduce employee turnover and absenteeism and improve worker performance, thereby creating some employer savings in the short run and generating incentives for productivity growth in the long run. The policies’ costs to employers and taxpayers are considerably smaller than some have projected. The author concludes by discussing recent developments in living wage campaigns that may lead to greater impacts in the future.","PeriodicalId":250738,"journal":{"name":"State of California Labor","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State of California Labor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/SCL.2003.2003.1.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Author(s): Reich, Michael | Abstract: Living wage mandates legislate minimum hourly wages that are considerably higher than minimum wage rates. Since 1994 living wage ordinances have been passed and, in varying degrees, implemented in over ninety-five local governmental entities in the United States; among them are twenty-one California cities. The author presents a summary of the living wage ordinances in California, including their wage mandate levels and their coverage. He discusses how the minimum wage and the federal poverty standard have failed to keep up with increased living costs, especially in California’s cities, and reviews arguments for and against living wage policies. The author also surveys older academic studies on minimum wage and living wages and then discusses a new generation of research studies on the impacts of living wages. This new set of studies, which includes detailed analyses of Los Angeles and San Francisco, provides a more careful and complete understanding than was previously available. Using before-and-after surveys of employers and workers and more sophisticated methodology, they reveal that living wage policies increase pay for their intended beneficiaries without creating disemployment effects. Living wage policies also reduce employee turnover and absenteeism and improve worker performance, thereby creating some employer savings in the short run and generating incentives for productivity growth in the long run. The policies’ costs to employers and taxpayers are considerably smaller than some have projected. The author concludes by discussing recent developments in living wage campaigns that may lead to greater impacts in the future.
加州的生活工资条例
摘要:生活工资法令规定的最低时薪远高于最低工资率。自1994年以来,生活工资条例已经通过,并在不同程度上在美国95个以上的地方政府实体中得到实施;其中有21个加州城市。作者提出了一个总结的生活工资条例在加利福尼亚州,包括他们的工资授权水平和他们的覆盖面。他讨论了最低工资和联邦贫困标准如何未能跟上生活成本的增长,尤其是在加州的城市,并回顾了支持和反对生活工资政策的争论。作者还回顾了关于最低工资和生活工资的旧学术研究,然后讨论了关于生活工资影响的新一代研究。这组新的研究包括对洛杉矶和旧金山的详细分析,提供了比以前更仔细、更全面的了解。通过对雇主和工人的前后调查以及更复杂的方法,他们揭示了生活工资政策在不造成失业影响的情况下增加了预期受益人的工资。最低工资政策还可以减少员工流动率和缺勤率,提高员工绩效,从而在短期内为雇主节省开支,并在长期内为生产率增长提供激励。这些政策给雇主和纳税人带来的成本比一些人预计的要小得多。作者最后讨论了生活工资运动的最新发展,这可能会在未来产生更大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信