Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?

Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad, Sania Moazzam, Christina Lo, Tianhan Lan, Elis Frroku, Heejun Kim
{"title":"Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?","authors":"Zahra Shakeri Hossein Abad, Sania Moazzam, Christina Lo, Tianhan Lan, Elis Frroku, Heejun Kim","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2018.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders’ needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).","PeriodicalId":247431,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 7th International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2018.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders’ needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).
需求激发中的大声和交互式纸上原型:它有什么好处?
需求工程是一个多学科的、以人为中心的过程,因此,由可再生能源生成的工件总是容易出错。这些错误中最重要的是缺少或误解需求。RE中的信息丢失可能导致软件中的逻辑被省略,这在开发的后期阶段将是非常困难的。在本文中,我们展示并研究了如何将互动和大声的纸上原型(LPP)集成在一起,以收集利益相关者的需求和期望,而不是单独的互动原型或面对面会议。为此,我们对(1)31个移动应用程序(App)开发团队进行了案例研究,这些团队采用交互式或大声原型,(2)19个移动应用程序开发团队只采用面对面的会议。从这项研究中,我们发现,虽然使用无声纸原型(SPP)比无纸原型(NPP)更有效地捕获非功能需求(NFRs)、用户界面(UI)需求和现有需求,但LPP更适用于管理NFRs、UI需求,以及添加新需求和删除/修改现有需求。我们还发现,在LPP和SPP中,LPP更有效地捕获和影响功能需求(FRs)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信