Experts and Publics in EU Environmental Law

Maria Lee
{"title":"Experts and Publics in EU Environmental Law","authors":"Maria Lee","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2424694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines two important themes of EU environmental law: the preoccupation with the generation of detailed environmental information and knowledge; and an emphasis on participatory modes of decision-making. Exploring a number of areas of EU environmental law, this paper details the processes for gathering information on ‘facts’ about the world, and for enabling more or less ‘public’ participation in decision-making. It highlights the legitimacy challenges raised by the limits of expertise as a decision-making resource, and by the advantages of industry in shaping that expertise. There are no simple solutions to the challenges raised, but ensuring transparency and inclusion, an opportunity for scrutiny and for hearing different and dissenting voices, are important responses. Decision-makers also need to become more adept at articulating the reasons for a decision that are not to be found in expert advice.","PeriodicalId":314145,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","volume":"188 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Restoration & Conservation (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2424694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper examines two important themes of EU environmental law: the preoccupation with the generation of detailed environmental information and knowledge; and an emphasis on participatory modes of decision-making. Exploring a number of areas of EU environmental law, this paper details the processes for gathering information on ‘facts’ about the world, and for enabling more or less ‘public’ participation in decision-making. It highlights the legitimacy challenges raised by the limits of expertise as a decision-making resource, and by the advantages of industry in shaping that expertise. There are no simple solutions to the challenges raised, but ensuring transparency and inclusion, an opportunity for scrutiny and for hearing different and dissenting voices, are important responses. Decision-makers also need to become more adept at articulating the reasons for a decision that are not to be found in expert advice.
欧盟环境法的专家和公众
本文考察了欧盟环境法的两个重要主题:对生成详细环境信息和知识的关注;并强调参与式决策模式。本文探讨了欧盟环境法的许多领域,详细介绍了收集世界“事实”信息的过程,以及使“公众”或多或少地参与决策的过程。它强调了专业知识作为决策资源的局限性以及行业在塑造专业知识方面的优势所带来的合法性挑战。对于所提出的挑战,没有简单的解决办法,但确保透明度和包容性,提供审查和听取不同意见的机会,是重要的回应。决策者还需要更加熟练地阐明专家建议中找不到的决策原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信