Multiple Environmental Benchmarking Data Analysis and its implications for design: a case study on packaging

R. Wever, C. Boks, H. van Es, A. Stevels
{"title":"Multiple Environmental Benchmarking Data Analysis and its implications for design: a case study on packaging","authors":"R. Wever, C. Boks, H. van Es, A. Stevels","doi":"10.1109/ECODIM.2005.1619353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For almost a decade Philips Consumer Electronics has been performing environmental benchmarking as a way of evaluating and improving the environmental performance of its products. This benchmarking is performed on product-only level and aims at five focal areas; energy, weight, packaging & transportation, potentially hazardous substances, and recyclability. It is believed that by combining the results from individual benchmark studies more general business performance conclusions may be drawn. In the past some preliminary studies have been done in this field. This paper reports on a more extensive study concerning the focal area of packaging & transportation. This analysis has yielded insights that could not have been obtained from product-level reports. It has been found that there are two distinct groups of products in the Philips CE portfolio, both asking for their own specific design and management approach. A second study is performed to determine what distinguishes these two groups. Finally, a case study on Philishave packaging was performed to verify the findings.","PeriodicalId":383623,"journal":{"name":"2005 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing","volume":"323 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2005 4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECODIM.2005.1619353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

For almost a decade Philips Consumer Electronics has been performing environmental benchmarking as a way of evaluating and improving the environmental performance of its products. This benchmarking is performed on product-only level and aims at five focal areas; energy, weight, packaging & transportation, potentially hazardous substances, and recyclability. It is believed that by combining the results from individual benchmark studies more general business performance conclusions may be drawn. In the past some preliminary studies have been done in this field. This paper reports on a more extensive study concerning the focal area of packaging & transportation. This analysis has yielded insights that could not have been obtained from product-level reports. It has been found that there are two distinct groups of products in the Philips CE portfolio, both asking for their own specific design and management approach. A second study is performed to determine what distinguishes these two groups. Finally, a case study on Philishave packaging was performed to verify the findings.
多重环境基准数据分析及其对设计的影响:包装案例研究
近十年来,飞利浦消费电子一直在执行环境基准测试,作为评估和改善其产品环境性能的一种方式。这种基准测试仅在产品层面进行,并针对五个重点领域;能源、重量、包装和运输、潜在有害物质和可回收性。笔者认为,通过结合个别基准研究的结果,可以得出更普遍的企业绩效结论。过去在这方面已经做了一些初步的研究。本文对包装运输这一重点领域进行了更广泛的研究。这种分析产生了无法从产品级报告中获得的见解。我们发现,飞利浦CE产品组合中有两组截然不同的产品,它们都需要自己特定的设计和管理方法。第二项研究是为了确定这两组的区别。最后,Philishave包装的一个案例研究进行了验证的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信