Comparison between Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Geotechnical Field Data for Characterizing Soil Profiles

S. M. Alogla, Omar M. Alawad, A. Elragi, S. Elkholy, Gamal A. Al-Saadi, M. Arif
{"title":"Comparison between Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Geotechnical Field Data for Characterizing Soil Profiles","authors":"S. M. Alogla, Omar M. Alawad, A. Elragi, S. Elkholy, Gamal A. Al-Saadi, M. Arif","doi":"10.2174/18741495-v16-e2206271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Electrical resistivity tests at a project site could be a valuable economical alternative to typical geotechnical soil exploration and a reliable source of data. In the present study, the soil at a constructed underground water tank site in Qassim Region – Saudi Arabia is investigated using the electrical resistivity testing method.\n \n \n \n The study aims to compare the results of traditional soil boreholes that were conducted at various stages of the project lifetime with the interpretation of soil resistivity test results.\n \n \n \n Eight soil boreholes were drilled at the water tank site to capture the nature of soil layers. The electrical resistivity of soil layers at the site is measured and used to investigate the ground subsurface of the project site. The geophysical software, ZondRes2d is utilized to analyze and interpret the collected data.\n \n \n \n Both geotechnical soil boreholes and geophysical electrical resistivity tests revealed similar soil profiles with three main layers comprising of backfill material, clay with expansive nature, and weathered limestone and marl. The results of the electrical resistivity tests are also affirmative of available resistance values of different soils in the literature.\n \n \n \n The study shows that electrical resistivity testing is reliable in capturing the soil nature which presents an attractive tool for preliminary investigation of the soil-related problems of distressed structures.\n","PeriodicalId":350575,"journal":{"name":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Civil Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/18741495-v16-e2206271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrical resistivity tests at a project site could be a valuable economical alternative to typical geotechnical soil exploration and a reliable source of data. In the present study, the soil at a constructed underground water tank site in Qassim Region – Saudi Arabia is investigated using the electrical resistivity testing method. The study aims to compare the results of traditional soil boreholes that were conducted at various stages of the project lifetime with the interpretation of soil resistivity test results. Eight soil boreholes were drilled at the water tank site to capture the nature of soil layers. The electrical resistivity of soil layers at the site is measured and used to investigate the ground subsurface of the project site. The geophysical software, ZondRes2d is utilized to analyze and interpret the collected data. Both geotechnical soil boreholes and geophysical electrical resistivity tests revealed similar soil profiles with three main layers comprising of backfill material, clay with expansive nature, and weathered limestone and marl. The results of the electrical resistivity tests are also affirmative of available resistance values of different soils in the literature. The study shows that electrical resistivity testing is reliable in capturing the soil nature which presents an attractive tool for preliminary investigation of the soil-related problems of distressed structures.
电阻率层析成像与土工现场数据表征土壤剖面的比较
在项目场址进行电阻率测试可能是典型岩土工程土壤勘探的一种有价值的经济替代方法,也是可靠的数据来源。本文采用电阻率法对沙特阿拉伯卡西姆地区一个已建成的地下蓄水池场地的土壤进行了研究。该研究旨在将在项目生命周期的不同阶段进行的传统土壤钻孔结果与土壤电阻率测试结果的解释进行比较。在水箱现场钻了8个土壤钻孔,以捕捉土层的性质。测量了现场土层的电阻率,并利用该电阻率对工程场地的地下进行了调查。利用地球物理软件ZondRes2d对采集数据进行分析和解释。岩土工程钻孔和地球物理电阻率测试显示了相似的土壤剖面,主要有三层,包括回填材料、膨胀性粘土、风化石灰岩和泥灰岩。电阻率试验的结果也肯定了文献中不同土壤的可用电阻值。研究结果表明,电阻率测试能够可靠地捕捉土壤性质,为初步研究受损结构土相关问题提供了一种有吸引力的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信