EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLOSED CIRCUIT IN COMPARISON WITH AN OPEN CIRCUIT OF CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS

Berik Tuishiev, Gulzhan Bayzhan, Sabina Samitova
{"title":"EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A CLOSED CIRCUIT IN COMPARISON WITH AN OPEN CIRCUIT OF CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS","authors":"Berik Tuishiev, Gulzhan Bayzhan, Sabina Samitova","doi":"10.35805/bsk2021iii044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop surgeries with the planned duration of cardiopulmonary bypass more than 2 hours in the immediate postoperative period. \nMaterials and methods. A study was carried out in the clinic over 10 patients (average age 47-56 years) with Diagnoses: Ascending aortic aneurysm, FC 3 aortic valve insufficiency, who underwent surgery for ascending aorta replacement, aortic valve replacement with coronary artery reimplantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the 1st group (5 patients) is the control group using an open cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, the 2nd group (5 patients) is the patients using a closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The total time of cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups was 125-187 minutes. \nResults. In the 2nd study group, drainage blood loss significantly decreased, on average 60-100 ml compared to the control group, where the average drainage loss was 600-1500 ml. The need for blood transfusion was 5.1% in the 2nd group, compared with 43.4% in the control group. In the study group 2, the number of platelets in the postoperative period in patients was higher than in the control group. \nConclusion. This study shows that a closed circuit, compared to an open one, allows complex heart surgeries with a planned duration of extracorporeal circulation of more than 2-3 hours.","PeriodicalId":197118,"journal":{"name":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BULLETIN OF SURGERY IN KAZAKHSTAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35805/bsk2021iii044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of closed-loop surgeries with the planned duration of cardiopulmonary bypass more than 2 hours in the immediate postoperative period. Materials and methods. A study was carried out in the clinic over 10 patients (average age 47-56 years) with Diagnoses: Ascending aortic aneurysm, FC 3 aortic valve insufficiency, who underwent surgery for ascending aorta replacement, aortic valve replacement with coronary artery reimplantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, the 1st group (5 patients) is the control group using an open cardiopulmonary bypass circuit, the 2nd group (5 patients) is the patients using a closed cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. The total time of cardiopulmonary bypass in both groups was 125-187 minutes. Results. In the 2nd study group, drainage blood loss significantly decreased, on average 60-100 ml compared to the control group, where the average drainage loss was 600-1500 ml. The need for blood transfusion was 5.1% in the 2nd group, compared with 43.4% in the control group. In the study group 2, the number of platelets in the postoperative period in patients was higher than in the control group. Conclusion. This study shows that a closed circuit, compared to an open one, allows complex heart surgeries with a planned duration of extracorporeal circulation of more than 2-3 hours.
体外循环闭式与开式的有效性比较
目的评价术后即刻计划体外循环时间大于2小时的闭环手术的效果。材料和方法。对10例诊断为升主动脉瘤、FC 3型主动脉瓣功能不全,行升主动脉置换术、主动脉瓣置换术合并冠状动脉再造术的患者(平均年龄47 ~ 56岁)进行临床研究。将患者分为两组,第一组(5例)为采用开放式体外循环的对照组,第二组(5例)为采用封闭式体外循环的患者。两组体外循环总时间125 ~ 187 min。结果。在第二个研究组中,引流失血量明显减少,平均为60-100 ml,而对照组的平均引流失血量为600-1500 ml。第二组需要输血的比例为5.1%,而对照组为43.4%。研究2组患者术后血小板数量高于对照组。结论。这项研究表明,与开放电路相比,封闭电路允许复杂的心脏手术,计划体外循环持续时间超过2-3小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信