Engineering families of protocols using a formal language: successes and failures

J. Gregoire
{"title":"Engineering families of protocols using a formal language: successes and failures","authors":"J. Gregoire","doi":"10.1109/WFCS.1997.634351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So called formal methods are notoriously weak on the \"method\" side. Refinement is arguably one of the best established method supported by mathematical notations and tools. We explore the use of refinement to specify retransmission mechanisms of communication protocols. Starting from a very abstract channel, we present a partial hierarchy of protocols ending with a fairly complex variation on sliding windows. While we were able to specify such a hierarchy, we have found that the benefits of using refinement to specify such protocols in a practical setting are limited.","PeriodicalId":433593,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems. WFCS'97","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 1997 IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems. WFCS'97","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WFCS.1997.634351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

So called formal methods are notoriously weak on the "method" side. Refinement is arguably one of the best established method supported by mathematical notations and tools. We explore the use of refinement to specify retransmission mechanisms of communication protocols. Starting from a very abstract channel, we present a partial hierarchy of protocols ending with a fairly complex variation on sliding windows. While we were able to specify such a hierarchy, we have found that the benefits of using refinement to specify such protocols in a practical setting are limited.
使用形式语言的工程协议族:成功与失败
所谓的形式化方法在“方法”方面是出了名的薄弱。精化可以说是由数学符号和工具支持的最成熟的方法之一。我们探索使用细化来指定通信协议的重传机制。从一个非常抽象的通道开始,我们提出了一个协议的部分层次结构,以滑动窗口的相当复杂的变化结束。虽然我们能够指定这样的层次结构,但我们发现在实际设置中使用细化来指定这样的协议的好处是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信