Environmental Armed Conflict Assessment Using Satellite Imagery

F. A. M. Garzón, I. Valánszki
{"title":"Environmental Armed Conflict Assessment Using Satellite Imagery","authors":"F. A. M. Garzón, I. Valánszki","doi":"10.2478/jengeo-2020-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Armed conflicts not only affect human populations but can also cause considerable damage to the environment. Its consequences are as diverse as its causes, including; water pollution from oil spills, land degradation due to the destruction of infrastructure, poisoning of soils and fields, destruction of crops and forests, over-exploitation of natural resources and paradoxically and occasionally reforestation. In this way, the environment in the war can be approached as beneficiary, stage, victim or/and spoil of war. Although there are few papers that assess the use of remote sensing methods in areas affected by warfare, we found a gap in these studies, being both outdated and lacking the correlation of remote sensing analysis with the causes-consequences, biome features and scale. Thus, this paper presents a methodical approach focused on the assessment of the existing datasets and the analysis of the connection between geographical conditions (biomes), drivers and the assessment using remote sensing methods in areas affected by armed conflicts. We aimed to find; weaknesses, tendencies, patterns, points of convergence and divergence. Then we consider variables such as biome, forest cover affectation, scale, and satellite imagery sensors to determine the relationship between warfare drivers with geographical location assessed by remote sensing methods. We collected data from 44 studies from international peer-reviewed journals from 1998 to 2019 that are indexed using scientific search engines. We found that 62% of the studies were focused on the analysis of torrid biomes as; Tropical Rainforest, Monsoon Forest / Dry Forest, Tree Savanna and Grass Savanna, using the 64% Moderate-resolution satellite imagery sensors as; Landsat 4-5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+. Quantitative analysis of the trends identified within these areas contributes to an understanding of the reasons behind these conflicts.","PeriodicalId":115431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Geography","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jengeo-2020-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Armed conflicts not only affect human populations but can also cause considerable damage to the environment. Its consequences are as diverse as its causes, including; water pollution from oil spills, land degradation due to the destruction of infrastructure, poisoning of soils and fields, destruction of crops and forests, over-exploitation of natural resources and paradoxically and occasionally reforestation. In this way, the environment in the war can be approached as beneficiary, stage, victim or/and spoil of war. Although there are few papers that assess the use of remote sensing methods in areas affected by warfare, we found a gap in these studies, being both outdated and lacking the correlation of remote sensing analysis with the causes-consequences, biome features and scale. Thus, this paper presents a methodical approach focused on the assessment of the existing datasets and the analysis of the connection between geographical conditions (biomes), drivers and the assessment using remote sensing methods in areas affected by armed conflicts. We aimed to find; weaknesses, tendencies, patterns, points of convergence and divergence. Then we consider variables such as biome, forest cover affectation, scale, and satellite imagery sensors to determine the relationship between warfare drivers with geographical location assessed by remote sensing methods. We collected data from 44 studies from international peer-reviewed journals from 1998 to 2019 that are indexed using scientific search engines. We found that 62% of the studies were focused on the analysis of torrid biomes as; Tropical Rainforest, Monsoon Forest / Dry Forest, Tree Savanna and Grass Savanna, using the 64% Moderate-resolution satellite imagery sensors as; Landsat 4-5 TM and Landsat 7 ETM+. Quantitative analysis of the trends identified within these areas contributes to an understanding of the reasons behind these conflicts.
利用卫星图像进行环境武装冲突评估
武装冲突不仅影响人口,而且会对环境造成相当大的破坏。其后果和原因一样多种多样,包括;石油泄漏造成的水污染、基础设施破坏造成的土地退化、土壤和田地中毒、作物和森林遭到破坏、自然资源的过度开发以及自相矛盾的、偶尔重新造林。通过这种方式,战争中的环境可以被视为战争的受益者、舞台、受害者或/和掠夺者。虽然很少有论文评估遥感方法在受战争影响地区的应用,但我们发现这些研究存在空白,既过时,又缺乏遥感分析与因果关系、生物群落特征和规模的相关性。因此,本文提出了一种系统的方法,侧重于评估现有数据集,并分析地理条件(生物群落)、驱动因素和使用遥感方法在受武装冲突影响地区进行评估之间的联系。我们的目标是找到;弱点、趋势、模式、趋同点和分歧点。然后,我们考虑诸如生物群落、森林覆盖影响、规模和卫星图像传感器等变量,以确定战争驱动因素与遥感方法评估的地理位置之间的关系。我们收集了1998年至2019年国际同行评审期刊上44项研究的数据,这些研究使用科学搜索引擎进行了索引。我们发现62%的研究集中在热带生物群系的分析上;热带雨林、季风森林/干旱森林、热带稀树草原和草原稀树草原,使用64%的中分辨率卫星图像传感器;Landsat 4-5 TM和Landsat 7 ETM+。对这些领域内确定的趋势进行定量分析有助于了解这些冲突背后的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信