Legalisasi Ganja Medis (Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 106/Puu-Xviii/2020)

Erik Dwi Prassetyo
{"title":"Legalisasi Ganja Medis (Analisis Putusan MK Nomor 106/Puu-Xviii/2020)","authors":"Erik Dwi Prassetyo","doi":"10.38043/jah.v5i2.3735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia is a state of law, the basic law for all laws and regulations in Indonesia is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In an effort to uphold the constitution and the principles of a democratic rule of law, the Constitutional Court has the authority to examine laws on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to knowing how the judges of the Constitutional Court considered the decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 and to find out the impact of the decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive analytical method which will explain the description of the analysis of the data that has been collected. Based on the results of the research on Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 it can be concluded that the judges of the Constitutional Court in their consideration have not fully fulfilled the aspects of justice and legal expediency and are more inclined to original intent and do not reflect contextual meaning. Broadly speaking, there are four impacts of the decision, among others, the existence of legal certainty, closing the opportunity for re-testing, the government must conduct research on the use of marijuana, and determine the next policy in the hands of the House of Representatives.","PeriodicalId":269797,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Analisis Hukum","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Analisis Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i2.3735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law, the basic law for all laws and regulations in Indonesia is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In an effort to uphold the constitution and the principles of a democratic rule of law, the Constitutional Court has the authority to examine laws on the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study aims to knowing how the judges of the Constitutional Court considered the decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 and to find out the impact of the decision. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive analytical method which will explain the description of the analysis of the data that has been collected. Based on the results of the research on Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 it can be concluded that the judges of the Constitutional Court in their consideration have not fully fulfilled the aspects of justice and legal expediency and are more inclined to original intent and do not reflect contextual meaning. Broadly speaking, there are four impacts of the decision, among others, the existence of legal certainty, closing the opportunity for re-testing, the government must conduct research on the use of marijuana, and determine the next policy in the hands of the House of Representatives.
医用大麻合法化(MK - 106/Puu-Xviii/2020)
印度尼西亚是一个法治国家,印度尼西亚所有法律法规的基本法是1945年的《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》。为了维护宪法和民主法治的原则,宪法法院有权审查关于1945年《印度尼西亚共和国宪法》的法律。本研究旨在了解宪法法院法官如何看待第106/PUU-XVIII/2020号决定,并找出该决定的影响。本研究采用规范性的司法方法与描述性分析方法,这将解释已收集的数据分析的描述。根据第106/PUU-XVIII/2020号决定的研究结果,可以得出结论,宪法法院法官在其审议中没有充分履行正义和法律权宜性方面,更倾向于原意,没有反映上下文意义。从广义上讲,该决定有四个影响,其中包括法律确定性的存在,关闭重新测试的机会,政府必须对大麻的使用进行研究,并确定众议院手中的下一步政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信