Performance Comparison between RSA and El-Gamal Algorithms for Speech Data Encryption and Decryption

Sura F. Yousif
{"title":"Performance Comparison between RSA and El-Gamal Algorithms for Speech Data Encryption and Decryption","authors":"Sura F. Yousif","doi":"10.24237/djes.2023.16112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents a performance comparison of two known public key cryptography techniques namely RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) and El-Gamal algorithms to encrypt/decrypt the speech signals during transferring over open networks. Specifically, this work is divided into two stages. The first stage is enciphering-deciphering the input speech file by employing the RSA method. The second stage is enciphering-deciphering the same input speech file by employing the El-Gamal method. Then, a comparative analysis is performed to test the performance of both cryptosystems using diverse experimental and statistical analyses for the ciphering and deciphering procedures like some known speech quality measures: histogram, spectrogram, correlation, differential, speed performance and noise effect analyses. The analyses outcomes reveal that the RSA and El-Gamal approaches are efficient and adequate for providing high degree of security, confidentiality and reliability. Additionally, the outcomes indicate that the RSA speech cryptosystem outperforms its counterpart the El-Gamal speech cryptosystem in most of ciphering/deciphering speech performance metrics.","PeriodicalId":294128,"journal":{"name":"Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diyala Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24237/djes.2023.16112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article presents a performance comparison of two known public key cryptography techniques namely RSA (Rivest–Shamir–Adleman) and El-Gamal algorithms to encrypt/decrypt the speech signals during transferring over open networks. Specifically, this work is divided into two stages. The first stage is enciphering-deciphering the input speech file by employing the RSA method. The second stage is enciphering-deciphering the same input speech file by employing the El-Gamal method. Then, a comparative analysis is performed to test the performance of both cryptosystems using diverse experimental and statistical analyses for the ciphering and deciphering procedures like some known speech quality measures: histogram, spectrogram, correlation, differential, speed performance and noise effect analyses. The analyses outcomes reveal that the RSA and El-Gamal approaches are efficient and adequate for providing high degree of security, confidentiality and reliability. Additionally, the outcomes indicate that the RSA speech cryptosystem outperforms its counterpart the El-Gamal speech cryptosystem in most of ciphering/deciphering speech performance metrics.
RSA和El-Gamal算法在语音数据加解密中的性能比较
本文介绍了两种已知的公钥加密技术的性能比较,即RSA (Rivest-Shamir-Adleman)和El-Gamal算法,用于在开放网络上传输语音信号时加密/解密。具体来说,这项工作分为两个阶段。第一阶段是使用RSA方法对输入的语音文件进行加密解密。第二阶段是使用El-Gamal方法对相同的输入语音文件进行加密-解密。然后,进行比较分析,以测试两种密码系统的性能,使用不同的实验和统计分析,如一些已知的语音质量测量:直方图,频谱图,相关性,差分,速度性能和噪声效应分析。分析结果表明,RSA和El-Gamal方法是有效的,足以提供高度的安全性、保密性和可靠性。此外,结果表明RSA语音密码系统在大多数加密/解密语音性能指标上优于其对应的El-Gamal语音密码系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信