RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE RESULTS OF PERSONAL INJURY AND PRECAUTIONARY EXAMS. BEFORE AND DURING

F. Santos, M. L. Duarte
{"title":"RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE RESULTS OF PERSONAL INJURY AND PRECAUTIONARY EXAMS. BEFORE AND DURING","authors":"F. Santos, M. L. Duarte","doi":"10.47005/230305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The covid-19 pandemic revealed the world’s vulnerability in dealing not only with an unknown disease, but also with socio-economic and violent difficulties and consequences, quite harmful to society. Objectives: To analyze the reports of the forensic examinations of personal injuries and precautionary measures carried out at IML Estácio de Lima – Maceió/AL, from 2018 to 2021, considering the changes that could be observed before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Documentary, epidemiological, descriptive, and analytical study through sampling. The variables considered were: gender, age group, origin, verification of the occurrence of bodily harm, the instrument and means used in the aggression, in addition to the answers to the official questions related to bodily harm. Results: Of a total of 2208 reports, 743 were investigations resulting from bodily injury and 1465 were precautionary investigations. The highest percentage of the analyzed reports was of precautionary expertise, constituting 66.34% of the total, with a prevalence of males, representing 92.01%. Regarding the body injury expertise, there was a higher prevalence of females in the age group from 21 to 30 years. Discussion: It was observed that there was no relevant change in the expertise in the previous period and during the pandemic, as precautionary expertise was already predominant, maintaining the predominance of male, young adults. Regarding the body injury expertise, the female gender was more prevalent, representing 63.52% of the reports analyzed during the study. The most evident injuries were those produced by blunt instruments without associations, in a total of 1048, with mild bodily injuries predominating. Conclusion: In view of the findings the authors conclude that there was no significant quantitative or qualitative change related to the analyzed expertise, before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Keywords: covid-19, personal injury, violence, medico-legal expertise.","PeriodicalId":366101,"journal":{"name":"Perspectivas em medicina legal e pericias medicas","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectivas em medicina legal e pericias medicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47005/230305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The covid-19 pandemic revealed the world’s vulnerability in dealing not only with an unknown disease, but also with socio-economic and violent difficulties and consequences, quite harmful to society. Objectives: To analyze the reports of the forensic examinations of personal injuries and precautionary measures carried out at IML Estácio de Lima – Maceió/AL, from 2018 to 2021, considering the changes that could be observed before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Material and methods: Documentary, epidemiological, descriptive, and analytical study through sampling. The variables considered were: gender, age group, origin, verification of the occurrence of bodily harm, the instrument and means used in the aggression, in addition to the answers to the official questions related to bodily harm. Results: Of a total of 2208 reports, 743 were investigations resulting from bodily injury and 1465 were precautionary investigations. The highest percentage of the analyzed reports was of precautionary expertise, constituting 66.34% of the total, with a prevalence of males, representing 92.01%. Regarding the body injury expertise, there was a higher prevalence of females in the age group from 21 to 30 years. Discussion: It was observed that there was no relevant change in the expertise in the previous period and during the pandemic, as precautionary expertise was already predominant, maintaining the predominance of male, young adults. Regarding the body injury expertise, the female gender was more prevalent, representing 63.52% of the reports analyzed during the study. The most evident injuries were those produced by blunt instruments without associations, in a total of 1048, with mild bodily injuries predominating. Conclusion: In view of the findings the authors conclude that there was no significant quantitative or qualitative change related to the analyzed expertise, before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. Keywords: covid-19, personal injury, violence, medico-legal expertise.
COVID-19大流行与人身伤害和预防性检查结果之间的关系。之前和期间
导言:2019冠状病毒病大流行不仅暴露了世界在应对一种未知疾病方面的脆弱性,也暴露了世界在应对对社会非常有害的社会经济和暴力困难及其后果方面的脆弱性。目的:考虑到2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间可能观察到的变化,分析2018年至2021年IML Estácio de Lima - Maceió/AL的人身伤害法医检查报告和预防措施。材料和方法:通过抽样进行文献、流行病学、描述性和分析性研究。考虑的变数包括:性别、年龄组、出身、对身体伤害发生情况的核实、在攻击中使用的工具和手段,以及对有关身体伤害的官方问题的回答。结果:2208例报告中,743例为身体伤害调查,1465例为预防性调查。所分析的报告中,预防专业知识的比例最高,占总数的66.34%,男性患病率为92.01%。在身体损伤专业知识方面,21 ~ 30岁年龄组的女性患病率较高。讨论:有人指出,在前一个时期和大流行病期间,专门知识方面没有相关变化,因为预防性专门知识已经占主导地位,保持了年轻男性成年人的优势。在身体损伤专业知识方面,女性更为普遍,占研究分析报告的63.52%。最明显的伤害是由钝器造成的,没有关联,总共1048例,轻微的身体伤害占主导地位。结论:鉴于这些发现,作者得出结论,在Covid-19大流行之前和期间,所分析的专业知识没有发生重大的定量或定性变化。关键词:covid-19,人身伤害,暴力,法医专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信