The complexities of developing a personal code of ethics for learning analytics practitioners: implications for institutions and the field

Charles Lang, Leah P. Macfadyen, Sharon Slade, P. Prinsloo, Niall Sclater
{"title":"The complexities of developing a personal code of ethics for learning analytics practitioners: implications for institutions and the field","authors":"Charles Lang, Leah P. Macfadyen, Sharon Slade, P. Prinsloo, Niall Sclater","doi":"10.1145/3170358.3170396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explore the potential role, value and utility of a personal code of ethics (COE) for learning analytics practitioners, and in particular we consider whether such a COE might usefully mediate individual actions and choices in relation to a more abstract institutional COE. While several institutional COEs now exist, little attention has been paid to detailing the ethical responsibilities of individual practitioners. To investigate the problems associated with developing and implementing a personal COE, we drafted an LA Practitioner COE based on other professional codes, and invited feedback from a range of learning analytics stakeholders and practitioners: ethicists, students, researchers and technology executives. Three main themes emerged from their reflections: 1. A need to balance real world demands with abstract principles, 2. The limits to individual accountability within the learning analytics space, and 3. The continuing value of debate around an aspirational code of ethics within the field of learning analytics.","PeriodicalId":437369,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

In this paper we explore the potential role, value and utility of a personal code of ethics (COE) for learning analytics practitioners, and in particular we consider whether such a COE might usefully mediate individual actions and choices in relation to a more abstract institutional COE. While several institutional COEs now exist, little attention has been paid to detailing the ethical responsibilities of individual practitioners. To investigate the problems associated with developing and implementing a personal COE, we drafted an LA Practitioner COE based on other professional codes, and invited feedback from a range of learning analytics stakeholders and practitioners: ethicists, students, researchers and technology executives. Three main themes emerged from their reflections: 1. A need to balance real world demands with abstract principles, 2. The limits to individual accountability within the learning analytics space, and 3. The continuing value of debate around an aspirational code of ethics within the field of learning analytics.
为学习分析从业者制定个人道德准则的复杂性:对机构和领域的影响
在本文中,我们探讨了个人道德准则(COE)对学习分析从业者的潜在作用、价值和效用,特别是我们考虑了这样的COE是否可以有效地调解与更抽象的机构COE相关的个人行为和选择。虽然现在存在几个机构性的伦理责任委员会,但很少注意详细说明个人从业者的道德责任。为了调查与开发和实现个人COE相关的问题,我们基于其他专业代码起草了LA从业者COE,并邀请了一系列学习分析涉众和实践者(伦理学家、学生、研究人员和技术主管)提供反馈。从他们的反思中产生了三个主要主题:1。需要平衡现实世界的需求和抽象原则;学习分析空间中个人责任的限制;围绕学习分析领域的理想道德准则进行辩论的持续价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信