Comparison and Review of 17 E-Book Platforms

John Lavender, Courtney McAllister
{"title":"Comparison and Review of 17 E-Book Platforms","authors":"John Lavender, Courtney McAllister","doi":"10.5703/1288284317162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The University of Michigan Press, with support from the Mellon Foundation, asked\n John Lavender, of Lavender Consulting, to conduct a review of the American Council of\n Learned Societies (ACLS) Humanities E-Book collection (HEB) following its launch on\n Michigan’s new Fulcrum platform. ACLS-HEB is an online collection of over 5,400\n high-quality humanities books from over 100 publishers. Now that the market for e-books\n has matured, part of the review was a comparative study of e-book platforms run by\n publishers, university presses and e-book vendors; 17 platforms were selected. The\n review looked at the key features offered by each platform, how they handled searching,\n content delivery, displaying results, ability to view and download and other key\n features, there was no attempt to judge the value of the content. Following this review,\n Michigan Press felt that it would be beneficial to share the results with the wider\n community. As well as being of interest to publishers, the review will also be relevant\n for librarians making purchasing decisions and vendors selling e-book services. In\n addition to synthesizing the results of the e-book platform review, this paper presents\n a librarian’s perspectives on e-book assessment criteria. Courtney McAllister,\n Electronic Resources Librarian at Yale University’s Law Library, describes the\n importance of attributes such as accessibility compliance, library branding, and\n metadata. Library collections are shaped by a plethora of concerns and criteria. This\n paper seeks to outline some key elements to consider as part of e-book platform\n decision-making.","PeriodicalId":143517,"journal":{"name":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many\n Things\"","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"\"The Time Has Come . . . to Talk of Many\n Things\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284317162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The University of Michigan Press, with support from the Mellon Foundation, asked John Lavender, of Lavender Consulting, to conduct a review of the American Council of Learned Societies (ACLS) Humanities E-Book collection (HEB) following its launch on Michigan’s new Fulcrum platform. ACLS-HEB is an online collection of over 5,400 high-quality humanities books from over 100 publishers. Now that the market for e-books has matured, part of the review was a comparative study of e-book platforms run by publishers, university presses and e-book vendors; 17 platforms were selected. The review looked at the key features offered by each platform, how they handled searching, content delivery, displaying results, ability to view and download and other key features, there was no attempt to judge the value of the content. Following this review, Michigan Press felt that it would be beneficial to share the results with the wider community. As well as being of interest to publishers, the review will also be relevant for librarians making purchasing decisions and vendors selling e-book services. In addition to synthesizing the results of the e-book platform review, this paper presents a librarian’s perspectives on e-book assessment criteria. Courtney McAllister, Electronic Resources Librarian at Yale University’s Law Library, describes the importance of attributes such as accessibility compliance, library branding, and metadata. Library collections are shaped by a plethora of concerns and criteria. This paper seeks to outline some key elements to consider as part of e-book platform decision-making.
17个电子书平台的比较与评价
密歇根大学出版社在梅隆基金会的支持下,邀请拉文德咨询公司的约翰·拉文德,在美国学术学会理事会(ACLS)人文学科电子书(HEB)在密歇根的新支点平台上发布后,对其进行审查。ACLS-HEB是来自100多家出版商的5,400多本高质量人文书籍的在线收藏。现在电子书市场已经成熟,这篇评论的一部分是对出版商、大学出版社和电子书供应商运营的电子书平台进行比较研究;17个平台被选中。该评论着眼于每个平台提供的关键功能,他们如何处理搜索、内容交付、显示结果、查看和下载能力以及其他关键功能,并没有试图判断内容的价值。在这次审查之后,密歇根出版社认为与更广泛的社区分享结果将是有益的。除了对出版商感兴趣外,这篇评论也将与图书馆员做出购买决定和销售电子书服务的供应商有关。本文除了综合电子书平台评估的结果外,还提出了图书馆员对电子书评估标准的看法。耶鲁大学法律图书馆的电子资源馆员Courtney McAllister描述了诸如可访问性遵从性、图书馆品牌和元数据等属性的重要性。图书馆馆藏是由过多的关注和标准塑造的。本文试图概述一些关键因素,考虑作为电子书平台决策的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信