Comparison of Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Experience of Video-Assisted Debriefing versus Oral Debriefing following High-Fidelity Human Simulation

C. Royle, Kathleen M. Hargiss
{"title":"Comparison of Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Experience of Video-Assisted Debriefing versus Oral Debriefing following High-Fidelity Human Simulation","authors":"C. Royle, Kathleen M. Hargiss","doi":"10.4018/IJSITA.2015040103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"High-Fidelity Human Simulation HFHS is used in many disciplines, including nursing, as an innovative teaching pedagogy that offers an active learning process. The simulation process involves a number of stages with the most critical stage identified as debriefing. The main focus of debriefing is to stimulate reflection and encourage communication while exploring the emotions of the participants. These emotions assist in framing the experience that aids in enhancement of learning for the student. This quantitative, quasi-experimental study explored the comparison of two debriefing processes, video-assisted and oral, by assessing the students' opinion of the debriefing experience and the students' rating of the importance of the debriefing experience. Participants were first semester baccalaureate nursing students. The overall finding and the four subscales for both dependent variables showed no statistical significance. This article provides further evidence to guide educators to a preferred method of debriefing students after a simulated experience.","PeriodicalId":201145,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Strateg. Inf. Technol. Appl.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Strateg. Inf. Technol. Appl.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSITA.2015040103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

High-Fidelity Human Simulation HFHS is used in many disciplines, including nursing, as an innovative teaching pedagogy that offers an active learning process. The simulation process involves a number of stages with the most critical stage identified as debriefing. The main focus of debriefing is to stimulate reflection and encourage communication while exploring the emotions of the participants. These emotions assist in framing the experience that aids in enhancement of learning for the student. This quantitative, quasi-experimental study explored the comparison of two debriefing processes, video-assisted and oral, by assessing the students' opinion of the debriefing experience and the students' rating of the importance of the debriefing experience. Participants were first semester baccalaureate nursing students. The overall finding and the four subscales for both dependent variables showed no statistical significance. This article provides further evidence to guide educators to a preferred method of debriefing students after a simulated experience.
护理本科学生高保真人体模拟后视频辅助述诉与口头述诉的比较
HFHS作为一种创新的教学方法,提供了一个积极的学习过程,被用于许多学科,包括护理学。模拟过程包括许多阶段,其中最关键的阶段被确定为汇报。汇报的主要重点是激发反思和鼓励交流,同时探索参与者的情绪。这些情绪有助于构建有助于提高学生学习的经验。这项定量的准实验研究通过评估学生对述职经历的看法和学生对述职经历重要性的评价,探讨了视频辅助和口头两种述职过程的比较。参与者为第一学期护理学士学位学生。两个因变量的总体结果和四个分量表均无统计学意义。这篇文章提供了进一步的证据,以指导教育工作者在模拟经历后向学生汇报的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信