REVIEW OF LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ETHICS TOWARDS INVESTIGATORS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE OF FOUR STUDENTS REFUSING OMNIBUS LAW

Dea Iswandi, Fadillah Rizky Nur Ikhlas, Ilham Khoirudin Sanjaya, M. Muflih
{"title":"REVIEW OF LEGAL PROFESSIONAL ETHICS TOWARDS INVESTIGATORS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE OF FOUR STUDENTS REFUSING OMNIBUS LAW","authors":"Dea Iswandi, Fadillah Rizky Nur Ikhlas, Ilham Khoirudin Sanjaya, M. Muflih","doi":"10.56444/ulrev.v5i2.2632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The way investigators handled students who were involved in thedemonstration to ratify the Job Creation Act did not reflect the slogan of \"protecting, nurturing, and serving the community\" carried by the institution. Instead of fostering and protecting the future of students, the police criminalize them. The police arrested students and students who opposed the job creation law in a number of areas last week. The police accused them of being anarchist. The police also threatened to include the status of law violators so that they would not issue a police recordcertificate (SKCK). Student involvement in demonstrations is not a criminal act. Moreover, students' and students' criticism of the Job Creation Act is actually a reaction to the inherent defects of the omnibus law. Not only is its preparation not transparent, the substance of the universal sweeping law also harms workers and threatens the environment. The case of students who are victims of criminalization forrefusing the Omnibus Law is still continuing its legal process to this day. However, the trial which is supposed to be the place to seek justice is run very subjectively and full of flaws. This further confirms that no violation of Professional Ethics conducted by investigators to the students repellent Omnibus.","PeriodicalId":259996,"journal":{"name":"UNTAG Law Review","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNTAG Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56444/ulrev.v5i2.2632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way investigators handled students who were involved in thedemonstration to ratify the Job Creation Act did not reflect the slogan of "protecting, nurturing, and serving the community" carried by the institution. Instead of fostering and protecting the future of students, the police criminalize them. The police arrested students and students who opposed the job creation law in a number of areas last week. The police accused them of being anarchist. The police also threatened to include the status of law violators so that they would not issue a police recordcertificate (SKCK). Student involvement in demonstrations is not a criminal act. Moreover, students' and students' criticism of the Job Creation Act is actually a reaction to the inherent defects of the omnibus law. Not only is its preparation not transparent, the substance of the universal sweeping law also harms workers and threatens the environment. The case of students who are victims of criminalization forrefusing the Omnibus Law is still continuing its legal process to this day. However, the trial which is supposed to be the place to seek justice is run very subjectively and full of flaws. This further confirms that no violation of Professional Ethics conducted by investigators to the students repellent Omnibus.
四名学生拒绝综合法刑事案件中侦查人员的法律职业道德检讨
调查人员处理参与批准《创造就业法案》示威的学生的方式,与该机构提出的“保护、培育和服务社区”的口号不符。警察没有培养和保护学生的未来,反而将他们定为犯罪。上周,警方在多个地区逮捕了反对《创造就业机会法》的学生和学生。警察指控他们是无政府主义者。警方还威胁说,要把违法者的身份包括在内,这样他们就不会发放警察记录证书(SKCK)。学生参与示威活动不是犯罪行为。此外,学生和学生对就业创造法案的批评实际上是对综合法案内在缺陷的一种反应。不仅它的准备工作不透明,全民清扫法的实质内容也伤害了工人,威胁了环境。学生因拒绝《综合法》而被定罪的案件至今仍在继续其法律程序。然而,审判本应是寻求正义的场所,其运行却非常主观,充满了缺陷。这进一步证实,调查人员没有违反职业道德的行为,对综合学校的学生进行排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信