When the Crowd Challenges the Lab: Lessons Learnt from Subjective Studies on Image Aesthetic Appeal

J. Redi, E. Siahaan, Pavel Korshunov, Julian Habigt, T. Hossfeld
{"title":"When the Crowd Challenges the Lab: Lessons Learnt from Subjective Studies on Image Aesthetic Appeal","authors":"J. Redi, E. Siahaan, Pavel Korshunov, Julian Habigt, T. Hossfeld","doi":"10.1145/2810188.2810194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdsourcing gives researchers the opportunity to collect subjective data quickly, in the real-world, and from a very diverse pool of users. In a long-term study on image aesthetic appeal, we challenged the crowdsourced assessments with typical lab methodologies in order to identify and analyze the impact of crowdsourcing environment on the reliability of subjective data. We identified and conducted three types of crowdsourcing experiments that helped us perform an in-depth analysis of factors influencing reliability and reproducibility of results in uncontrolled crowdsourcing environments. We provide a generalized summary of lessons learnt for future research studies which will try to port lab-based evaluation methodologies into crowdsourcing, so that they can avoid the typical pitfalls in design and analysis of crowdsourcing experiments.","PeriodicalId":284531,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Crowdsourcing for Multimedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2810188.2810194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Crowdsourcing gives researchers the opportunity to collect subjective data quickly, in the real-world, and from a very diverse pool of users. In a long-term study on image aesthetic appeal, we challenged the crowdsourced assessments with typical lab methodologies in order to identify and analyze the impact of crowdsourcing environment on the reliability of subjective data. We identified and conducted three types of crowdsourcing experiments that helped us perform an in-depth analysis of factors influencing reliability and reproducibility of results in uncontrolled crowdsourcing environments. We provide a generalized summary of lessons learnt for future research studies which will try to port lab-based evaluation methodologies into crowdsourcing, so that they can avoid the typical pitfalls in design and analysis of crowdsourcing experiments.
当人群挑战实验室:图像审美吸引力主观研究的经验教训
众包使研究人员有机会在现实世界中,从非常多样化的用户池中快速收集主观数据。在一项关于图像审美吸引力的长期研究中,我们用典型的实验室方法挑战众包评估,以识别和分析众包环境对主观数据可靠性的影响。我们确定并进行了三种类型的众包实验,这些实验帮助我们深入分析了在不受控制的众包环境中影响结果可靠性和可重复性的因素。我们为未来的研究提供了一个经验总结,这些研究将尝试将基于实验室的评估方法移植到众包中,这样他们就可以避免在众包实验的设计和分析中出现的典型陷阱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信