Implementing Chain of Custody Requirements in Database Audit Records for Forensic Purposes

Denys A. Flores, A. Jhumka
{"title":"Implementing Chain of Custody Requirements in Database Audit Records for Forensic Purposes","authors":"Denys A. Flores, A. Jhumka","doi":"10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During forensic database investigations, audit records become a crucial evidential element; particularly, when certain events can be attributed to insider activity. However, traditional reactive forensic methods may not be suitable, urging the adoption of proactive approaches that can be used to ensure accountability through audit records whilst satisfying Chain of Custody (CoC) requirements for forensic purposes. In this paper, role segregation, evidence provenance, event timeliness and causality are considered as CoC requirements in order to implement a forensically ready architecture for the proactive generation, collection and preservation of database audit records that can be used as digital evidence for the investigation of insider activity. Our proposal implements triggers and stored procedures as forensic routines in order to build a vector-clock-based timeline for explaining causality in transactional events recorded in audit tables. We expect to encourage further work in the field of proactive digital forensics and forensic readiness; in particular, for justifying admissibility of audit records under CoC restrictions.","PeriodicalId":170253,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","volume":"53 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.2017.299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

During forensic database investigations, audit records become a crucial evidential element; particularly, when certain events can be attributed to insider activity. However, traditional reactive forensic methods may not be suitable, urging the adoption of proactive approaches that can be used to ensure accountability through audit records whilst satisfying Chain of Custody (CoC) requirements for forensic purposes. In this paper, role segregation, evidence provenance, event timeliness and causality are considered as CoC requirements in order to implement a forensically ready architecture for the proactive generation, collection and preservation of database audit records that can be used as digital evidence for the investigation of insider activity. Our proposal implements triggers and stored procedures as forensic routines in order to build a vector-clock-based timeline for explaining causality in transactional events recorded in audit tables. We expect to encourage further work in the field of proactive digital forensics and forensic readiness; in particular, for justifying admissibility of audit records under CoC restrictions.
在数据库审计记录中实施监管链规定,以供司法鉴定之用
在司法数据库调查中,审计记录成为重要的证据要素;特别是当某些事件可以归因于内部活动时。然而,传统的被动法证方法可能不适合,敦促采用积极主动的方法,可以通过审计记录来确保问责制,同时满足法务目的的监管链(CoC)要求。在本文中,角色隔离、证据来源、事件时效性和因果关系被认为是CoC的要求,以便实现一个法医就绪的架构,用于主动生成、收集和保存数据库审计记录,这些记录可以用作调查内幕活动的数字证据。我们的建议将触发器和存储过程实现为取证例程,以构建基于矢量时钟的时间轴,用于解释审计表中记录的事务事件中的因果关系。我们希望鼓励在主动数字取证和取证准备领域进一步开展工作;特别是为了证明在CoC限制下审计记录的可接受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信