Contradictions of virtual competition as a result of algorithmization of management on digital platforms: institutional context

V. Lypov
{"title":"Contradictions of virtual competition as a result of algorithmization of management on digital platforms: institutional context","authors":"V. Lypov","doi":"10.15407/etet2022.01.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the preconditions and mechanisms of management algorithmization on information (digital) platforms (IPs) and their contradictory impact on the transformation of competition in the tourism sector. The sources of competitive advantages of IPs formed as a result of digitalization are presented. The author reveals positive and negative consequences of the influence of platformization on the development of competitive relations for manufacturers and consumers. The negative ones include the monopolization of markets, the transition from the \"invisible hand (Providence / market)\" to the digital hand of IP and to computing devices that are devoid of subjectivity and from \"data mining\" to \"reality mining\", which influences consumer's thinking in order to control his behavior. The IPs assume the role of an intermediary-arbiter between potential competitors for the user's attention. The differences between IP as an innovative institutional form on the one hand, and hierarchical, network and market structures on the other are substantiated. The features of the algorithmic management model are revealed and the mechanisms of its functioning based on the use of rating and ranking tools are shown. It is based on the co-optation of ecosystem participants in the process of solving managerial tasks without delegating leadership powers to them. Managerial influence is replaced by regulation based on the algorithmic involvement of independent participants in the creation of new value. There is a transition from the \"iron cage\" of bureaucratic procedures to the \"invisible cage\" of quickly and easily changeable rules established by IP. The users’ ratings are recalculated into constantly renewable ranks, which serve to stimulate responses from producers and users. “Content supervision” by IP turns into a tool of IP’s “supervisory control” over producers. As a result, they, like consumers, become absolutely dependent on IP, which determines the order and carries out the ranking, and thereby predetermines success in the competitive struggle.","PeriodicalId":209799,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomìčna teorìâ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.01.026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article analyzes the preconditions and mechanisms of management algorithmization on information (digital) platforms (IPs) and their contradictory impact on the transformation of competition in the tourism sector. The sources of competitive advantages of IPs formed as a result of digitalization are presented. The author reveals positive and negative consequences of the influence of platformization on the development of competitive relations for manufacturers and consumers. The negative ones include the monopolization of markets, the transition from the "invisible hand (Providence / market)" to the digital hand of IP and to computing devices that are devoid of subjectivity and from "data mining" to "reality mining", which influences consumer's thinking in order to control his behavior. The IPs assume the role of an intermediary-arbiter between potential competitors for the user's attention. The differences between IP as an innovative institutional form on the one hand, and hierarchical, network and market structures on the other are substantiated. The features of the algorithmic management model are revealed and the mechanisms of its functioning based on the use of rating and ranking tools are shown. It is based on the co-optation of ecosystem participants in the process of solving managerial tasks without delegating leadership powers to them. Managerial influence is replaced by regulation based on the algorithmic involvement of independent participants in the creation of new value. There is a transition from the "iron cage" of bureaucratic procedures to the "invisible cage" of quickly and easily changeable rules established by IP. The users’ ratings are recalculated into constantly renewable ranks, which serve to stimulate responses from producers and users. “Content supervision” by IP turns into a tool of IP’s “supervisory control” over producers. As a result, they, like consumers, become absolutely dependent on IP, which determines the order and carries out the ranking, and thereby predetermines success in the competitive struggle.
数字平台管理算法化导致的虚拟竞争矛盾:制度背景
本文分析了信息(数字)平台管理算法化的前提条件和机制,以及它们对旅游行业竞争转型的矛盾影响。指出了数字化所形成的知识产权竞争优势的来源。作者揭示了平台化对制造商和消费者竞争关系发展的积极和消极影响。消极的方面包括市场的垄断,从“看不见的手(天意/市场)”到IP的数字手和没有主观性的计算设备的转变,从“数据挖掘”到“现实挖掘”的转变,影响消费者的思维,从而控制消费者的行为。ip在潜在竞争者之间扮演中介仲裁者的角色,以吸引用户的注意力。知识产权作为一种创新的制度形式,与等级结构、网络结构和市场结构的差异得到了证实。揭示了算法管理模型的特点,并展示了基于使用评级和排名工具的算法管理模型的功能机制。它基于生态系统参与者在解决管理任务过程中的合作,而不将领导权委托给他们。管理影响被基于独立参与者在新价值创造中的算法参与的监管所取代。从官僚程序的“铁笼子”过渡到由知识产权建立的快速且容易改变的规则的“无形笼子”。用户的评分被重新计算为不断更新的排名,以刺激生产者和用户的反应。知识产权的“内容监管”成为知识产权对生产者进行“监督控制”的工具。因此,他们和消费者一样,对IP产生了绝对的依赖,IP决定了顺序,进行了排名,从而预先决定了竞争中的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信