Problems Of Using YERDR As A System Of Information Support For Pre-Trial Investigation Of Criminal Offenses

S. Krul
{"title":"Problems Of Using YERDR As A System Of Information Support For Pre-Trial Investigation Of Criminal Offenses","authors":"S. Krul","doi":"10.15330/apiclu.51.136-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practice shows that today law enforcement is increasingly a need to obtain and use information about objects that were in the scope of the investigation on a variety of information systems regardless of their departmental affiliation. Therefore, it is proper information and reference software is a prerequisite for success of the pre-trial investigation. \nCrime investigation, as a dynamic procedural activity, goes through separate stages and is a process of transition from the original procedural situations to the next. Such activities are not possible without proper information and inquiry support for the investigation of crimes. \nAnalyzing this order, it should be noted that the YERDR structure includes a large number of records of persons for whom criminal proceedings have been opened, as well as persons who were interested persons (applicant, victim, etc.) of these proceedings. In connection with what we can attribute a single register of pre-trial investigations to the information-inquiry systems of pre-trial investigation bodies. \nTherefore, it can be concluded that the investigator conducting the direct investigation of criminal offenses is limited in information on other criminal offenses. As a result, investigators consider the ineffective use of YERDR in criminal investigations as information support. Therefore, we suggest that investigators, after reporting a suspected person, have access to information outside the criminal offenses that they are being investigated. In addition, the cases provided for by the law on state secrets. \nThis paper analyzes the use «YERDR» criminal investigation body and along these lines is suggested to use a registry as providing information and help investigate crimes.","PeriodicalId":196689,"journal":{"name":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","volume":"203 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual problems of improving of current legislation of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15330/apiclu.51.136-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Practice shows that today law enforcement is increasingly a need to obtain and use information about objects that were in the scope of the investigation on a variety of information systems regardless of their departmental affiliation. Therefore, it is proper information and reference software is a prerequisite for success of the pre-trial investigation. Crime investigation, as a dynamic procedural activity, goes through separate stages and is a process of transition from the original procedural situations to the next. Such activities are not possible without proper information and inquiry support for the investigation of crimes. Analyzing this order, it should be noted that the YERDR structure includes a large number of records of persons for whom criminal proceedings have been opened, as well as persons who were interested persons (applicant, victim, etc.) of these proceedings. In connection with what we can attribute a single register of pre-trial investigations to the information-inquiry systems of pre-trial investigation bodies. Therefore, it can be concluded that the investigator conducting the direct investigation of criminal offenses is limited in information on other criminal offenses. As a result, investigators consider the ineffective use of YERDR in criminal investigations as information support. Therefore, we suggest that investigators, after reporting a suspected person, have access to information outside the criminal offenses that they are being investigated. In addition, the cases provided for by the law on state secrets. This paper analyzes the use «YERDR» criminal investigation body and along these lines is suggested to use a registry as providing information and help investigate crimes.
利用YERDR作为刑事犯罪审前侦查信息支持系统的若干问题
实践表明,今天的执法越来越需要在各种信息系统上获取和使用关于被调查对象的信息,而不论其隶属于哪个部门。因此,适当的信息和参考软件是预审侦查成功的先决条件。犯罪侦查作为一项动态的程序活动,经历了不同的阶段,是由原来的程序状态向下一个程序状态过渡的过程。如果没有调查犯罪的适当资料和调查支助,这些活动是不可能进行的。在分析这一顺序时,应当指出,YERDR结构包括已对其提起刑事诉讼的人的大量记录,以及与这些诉讼有利害关系的人(申请人、受害者等)的记录。在这方面,我们可以将单一的审前调查登记册归功于审前调查机构的信息查询系统。因此,可以得出结论,直接侦查刑事犯罪的侦查人员对其他刑事犯罪的了解有限。因此,调查人员认为在刑事调查中无效地使用YERDR作为信息支持。因此,我们建议调查人员在报告嫌疑人之后,可以获得他们正在调查的刑事犯罪以外的信息。此外,国家保密法规定的案件。本文对“YERDR”刑事侦查机构的使用进行了分析,并在此基础上提出了利用登记处提供信息和协助侦查犯罪的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信