Freedom to Provide Services in European and Croatian Law

Nada Bodiroga Vukobrat, Hana Horak
{"title":"Freedom to Provide Services in European and Croatian Law","authors":"Nada Bodiroga Vukobrat, Hana Horak","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2237885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paper analyses the freedom of provide services, recent judicial practice and trends of developing since “Bolkenstein directive” until today. Directive was suggested with purpose of eliminating obstacles in services area. It provoked controversies not only in EU member states but also in wider public. Previously to second reading of Directive on Services (July 2006) two year work preceded since the Committee published the draft of the Directive. Changes proposal is a balance between liberalization of services and preservation of “European social model”. Directive determines general legal frame in which measures of harmonization are used, along with administrative cooperation and development of treatment codex in certain areas. Most important novelty brought by the Directive is changed principle of “country of origin” in “freedom to provide service”.","PeriodicalId":319905,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","volume":"334 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Treaties & Other Sources of International Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2237885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paper analyses the freedom of provide services, recent judicial practice and trends of developing since “Bolkenstein directive” until today. Directive was suggested with purpose of eliminating obstacles in services area. It provoked controversies not only in EU member states but also in wider public. Previously to second reading of Directive on Services (July 2006) two year work preceded since the Committee published the draft of the Directive. Changes proposal is a balance between liberalization of services and preservation of “European social model”. Directive determines general legal frame in which measures of harmonization are used, along with administrative cooperation and development of treatment codex in certain areas. Most important novelty brought by the Directive is changed principle of “country of origin” in “freedom to provide service”.
在欧洲和克罗地亚法律中提供服务的自由
文章分析了服务自由自“博肯斯坦指令”至今的司法实践和发展趋势。该指令的目的是消除服务领域的障碍。它不仅在欧盟成员国,而且在更广泛的公众中引发了争议。自委员会公布指令草案以来,服务指令(2006年7月)的二读工作已经进行了两年。改革建议是在服务业自由化和保留“欧洲社会模式”之间取得平衡。该指令确定了使用协调措施的一般法律框架,以及在某些领域进行行政合作和制定处理法典。该指令带来的最重要的新颖性是改变了“提供服务的自由”中的“原产国”原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信