Experiences from Applying WCET Analysis in Industrial Settings

J. Gustafsson, Andreas Ermedahl
{"title":"Experiences from Applying WCET Analysis in Industrial Settings","authors":"J. Gustafsson, Andreas Ermedahl","doi":"10.1109/ISORC.2007.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowing the program timing characteristics is fundamental to the successful design and execution of real-time systems. Today, measurement-based timing analysis tools such as in-circuit emulators, logic analyzers and oscilloscopes, are used in industry. A critical timing measure is the worst-case execution time (WCET) of a program. Recently, tools for deriving WCET estimates, mostly based on static program analysis, have reached the market. In this article, we summarize experiences from five different industrial case-studies. The studies were made on typical industrial systems, in close cooperation with the system developers, using both static and measurement-based tools. The primary purpose was to investigate the difficulties involved in applying current timing analysis methods to industrial code. We were also interested how WCET estimates can be derived by different methods, how labor-intensive the methods are, and the accuracy of obtained results. As a result, we provide observations on the benefits and drawbacks of the different timing analysis methods used and specify general conditions when a particular method should be most beneficial. We also show the benefits of having several types of timing analysis tools available","PeriodicalId":265471,"journal":{"name":"10th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'07)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2007.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

Knowing the program timing characteristics is fundamental to the successful design and execution of real-time systems. Today, measurement-based timing analysis tools such as in-circuit emulators, logic analyzers and oscilloscopes, are used in industry. A critical timing measure is the worst-case execution time (WCET) of a program. Recently, tools for deriving WCET estimates, mostly based on static program analysis, have reached the market. In this article, we summarize experiences from five different industrial case-studies. The studies were made on typical industrial systems, in close cooperation with the system developers, using both static and measurement-based tools. The primary purpose was to investigate the difficulties involved in applying current timing analysis methods to industrial code. We were also interested how WCET estimates can be derived by different methods, how labor-intensive the methods are, and the accuracy of obtained results. As a result, we provide observations on the benefits and drawbacks of the different timing analysis methods used and specify general conditions when a particular method should be most beneficial. We also show the benefits of having several types of timing analysis tools available
应用WCET分析在工业环境中的经验
了解程序定时特性是实时系统成功设计和执行的基础。今天,基于测量的时序分析工具,如在线仿真器,逻辑分析仪和示波器,在工业中使用。一个关键的时序度量是程序的最坏情况执行时间(WCET)。最近,用于获得WCET估计的工具,主要基于静态程序分析,已经进入市场。在本文中,我们总结了五个不同行业案例的经验。这些研究是在典型的工业系统上进行的,与系统开发人员密切合作,使用静态和基于测量的工具。主要目的是调查将当前时序分析方法应用于工业代码所涉及的困难。我们还对如何通过不同的方法得出WCET估计感兴趣,这些方法的劳动强度如何,以及获得结果的准确性。因此,我们提供了对所使用的不同时序分析方法的优点和缺点的观察,并指定了特定方法最有益的一般条件。我们还展示了使用几种类型的计时分析工具的好处
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信