Abraham Accords: Palestine issue should be addressed for a peaceful Middle East

Polen Bayrak
{"title":"Abraham Accords: Palestine issue should be addressed for a peaceful Middle East","authors":"Polen Bayrak","doi":"10.38154/cjas.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decades of tensions in the Middle East have left many regional countries in tatters. The Abraham Accords – a joint declaration of the United States, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates, was signed alongside a peace agreement, although there has never been a state of war or conflict between Israel and the UAE. To achieve full peace and stability in the region, the resolution of the Palestine-Israeli conflict is vital. The United States and Israel have a long history of cooperation in the maintenance of the security of Israel that ensures the protection of US interests to the detriment of other regional powers that may have the potential to become influential in the region, and that ignore Western interests. Geopolitical changes in the Middle East over the last decade have altered the threat perspective of the Arab monarchies. Support for the creation of an independent Palestine has diminished as the issue has started to be seen as a distraction from the real and immediate threats from emerging regional powers. Although the Gulf nations may wish to present themselves as the Arab protector of Palestine, they clarify that “every tub must stand on its own bottom.” The US support of a peaceful environment was a result of the Chinese presence in the region, which the former perceived as a threat to its hegemony. However, long-term peace cannot be achieved without taking into account the Palestinian issue, as the primary conflict. In the same vein, countries such as Iran and Turkey did not welcome the normalization situation between Israel and the Arab states due to the ignorance of the Palestinians’ interests. There are weaknesses of the Accords perhaps due to its impatient timing, and its contradiction with the international community, such as the UN, and its disregard of the two-state solution.","PeriodicalId":330439,"journal":{"name":"Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies (CJAS), Cappadocia University","volume":"93 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cappadocia Journal of Area Studies (CJAS), Cappadocia University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38154/cjas.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Decades of tensions in the Middle East have left many regional countries in tatters. The Abraham Accords – a joint declaration of the United States, Israel, and the United Arab Emirates, was signed alongside a peace agreement, although there has never been a state of war or conflict between Israel and the UAE. To achieve full peace and stability in the region, the resolution of the Palestine-Israeli conflict is vital. The United States and Israel have a long history of cooperation in the maintenance of the security of Israel that ensures the protection of US interests to the detriment of other regional powers that may have the potential to become influential in the region, and that ignore Western interests. Geopolitical changes in the Middle East over the last decade have altered the threat perspective of the Arab monarchies. Support for the creation of an independent Palestine has diminished as the issue has started to be seen as a distraction from the real and immediate threats from emerging regional powers. Although the Gulf nations may wish to present themselves as the Arab protector of Palestine, they clarify that “every tub must stand on its own bottom.” The US support of a peaceful environment was a result of the Chinese presence in the region, which the former perceived as a threat to its hegemony. However, long-term peace cannot be achieved without taking into account the Palestinian issue, as the primary conflict. In the same vein, countries such as Iran and Turkey did not welcome the normalization situation between Israel and the Arab states due to the ignorance of the Palestinians’ interests. There are weaknesses of the Accords perhaps due to its impatient timing, and its contradiction with the international community, such as the UN, and its disregard of the two-state solution.
亚伯拉罕协议:解决巴勒斯坦问题,实现中东和平
中东地区几十年的紧张局势使该地区许多国家支离破碎。《亚伯拉罕协议》是美国、以色列和阿拉伯联合酋长国的联合声明,与和平协议一起签署,尽管以色列和阿联酋之间从未发生过战争或冲突。为了实现该地区的全面和平与稳定,解决巴以冲突至关重要。美国和以色列在维护以色列安全方面有着悠久的合作历史,这确保了美国利益的保护,而损害了其他可能在该地区具有影响力的地区大国,这些大国忽视了西方的利益。过去十年中东地缘政治的变化改变了阿拉伯君主制国家对威胁的看法。对建立一个独立的巴勒斯坦的支持已经减少,因为这个问题已经开始被视为分散了人们对新兴地区大国真正和直接威胁的注意力。尽管海湾国家可能希望把自己呈现为巴勒斯坦的阿拉伯保护者,但他们澄清说“每个浴盆都必须站在自己的底部。”美国之所以支持和平环境,是因为中国在该地区的存在,美国认为这是对其霸权的威胁。然而,如果不考虑作为主要冲突的巴勒斯坦问题,就不可能实现长期和平。同样,伊朗、土耳其等国也不欢迎以色列与阿拉伯国家的关系正常化,因为他们无视巴勒斯坦人的利益。《和平协议》存在弱点,这可能是由于它的时机不够耐心,它与联合国等国际社会的矛盾,以及它对两国解决方案的无视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信