Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion

American Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2020-08-31 DOI:10.11648/J.AJNS.20200905.13

Huixia Yu, Xiutin Li, Jian Li, Yi Yang, Guanmin Wu, Guiyan Wen

{"title":"Assessing the Effect of Personalized Nursing on Thrombolytic Hemodialysis Patients After Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion","authors":"Huixia Yu, Xiutin Li, Jian Li, Yi Yang, Guanmin Wu, Guiyan Wen","doi":"10.11648/J.AJNS.20200905.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To assess the effect of personalized nursing on thrombolytic hemodialysis patients after arteriovenous fistula occlusion. Methods: 92 patients who undergoing arteriovenous fistula in the hospital were invited to join our study. The time of they receive the treatment is from May 2015 to July 2020. In study beginning, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 46). The two groups receive different nursing intervention. The control group receive common nursing intervention. On the other hand, the intervention group patients receive personalized nursing intervention in treatment process. Result: In basic patient information, the patient basic status are similar [20 (47.6%) vs 23 (54.8%), 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07, 1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69], that the gender, age and number of thrombolysis are not statistical significance (p > 0.05). In thrombolysis success rate research, the intervention group has higher thrombolysis success rate than that of control group [38 (90.5%) vs 32 (76.2%), p = 0.016]. In patient satisfaction research result, more intervention group patients make very well assessment than that of control group patients [19 (45.2%) vs 10 (23.8%), p < 0.005]. Conclusion: the personalized nursing intervention not only increase thrombolysis success rate but also improve the patient satisfaction in arteriovenous fistula occlusion.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.AJNS.20200905.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect of personalized nursing on thrombolytic hemodialysis patients after arteriovenous fistula occlusion. Methods: 92 patients who undergoing arteriovenous fistula in the hospital were invited to join our study. The time of they receive the treatment is from May 2015 to July 2020. In study beginning, the patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n = 46) and an intervention group (n = 46). The two groups receive different nursing intervention. The control group receive common nursing intervention. On the other hand, the intervention group patients receive personalized nursing intervention in treatment process. Result: In basic patient information, the patient basic status are similar [20 (47.6%) vs 23 (54.8%), 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07, 1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69], that the gender, age and number of thrombolysis are not statistical significance (p > 0.05). In thrombolysis success rate research, the intervention group has higher thrombolysis success rate than that of control group [38 (90.5%) vs 32 (76.2%), p = 0.016]. In patient satisfaction research result, more intervention group patients make very well assessment than that of control group patients [19 (45.2%) vs 10 (23.8%), p < 0.005]. Conclusion: the personalized nursing intervention not only increase thrombolysis success rate but also improve the patient satisfaction in arteriovenous fistula occlusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

个性化护理对溶栓性血透患者动静脉瘘封堵后的效果评价

目的:探讨个性化护理对溶栓血液透析患者动静脉瘘闭塞术后的影响。方法:选取92例在我院行动静脉瘘术的患者作为研究对象。他们接受治疗的时间为2015年5月至2020年7月。研究开始时，将患者随机分为对照组(n = 46)和干预组(n = 46)。两组接受不同的护理干预。对照组给予常规护理干预。另一方面，干预组患者在治疗过程中接受个性化护理干预。结果:在患者基本信息方面，患者基本状态相似[20 (47.6%)vs 23(54.8%)， 38.14±9.12 vs 37.88±10.07,1.41±0.75 vs 1.37±0.69]，性别、年龄、溶栓次数差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。在溶栓成功率研究中，干预组溶栓成功率高于对照组[38例(90.5%)vs 32例(76.2%)，p = 0.016]。在患者满意度研究结果中，干预组患者评价非常好的患者多于对照组患者[19例(45.2%)vs 10例(23.8%)，p < 0.005]。结论:个性化护理干预不仅提高了动静脉瘘封堵术溶栓成功率，而且提高了患者满意度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Nursing Science

自引率

0.00%

发文量