Effect of veneering thickness and repeated firing on the flexural strength and translucency of lithium disilicate glass ceramic

A. Sheir, Walid Al-Zordk, Manal Abou Madina
{"title":"Effect of veneering thickness and repeated firing on the flexural strength and translucency of lithium disilicate glass ceramic","authors":"A. Sheir, Walid Al-Zordk, Manal Abou Madina","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.199970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate effect of veneering thickness and repeated firing on the flexural strength and translucency of lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Materials and methods: Sixty-three-disc specimens were divided; each group have 21 discs specimens. First group was lithium disilicate core 1 mm with no veneering coverage, second group the lithium disilicate core was veneered by 0.5 mm nano flouroapatite glass ceramic. Third group was lithium disilicate core veneered by 1 mm nano flouroapatite glass ceramic. Each group was subjected to repeated firing cycles (3, 5, 7). Seven-disc specimens for each firing cycle were used to measure translucency then flexural strength. The degree of color difference between the compared colors was expressed in ∆E units. The total color difference, according to L*, H*, C* coordinates, was calculated. Then change in TP (∆TP) which is the difference between first and second sample regarding thickness and firing cycles was measured to determine the acceptability threshold. Then fracture load was applied to all specimens fixed on 3 balls fixture under static compressive loading using universal testing machine to determine the flexural strength. The results were tabulated and statistical analysis was performedusing repeated way ANOVA method. Results: Regarding value, chroma and hue, in 3 firing cycles value means revealed a significant difference in the comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) thickness and between 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was shown between 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.325). While chroma and hue showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.001). However, in 5 firing cycles, value showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) and also between 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.016), and chroma also showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001), and hue showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.027), and also between 1 mm, 2 mm and 1.5 mm, 2 mm. However, in 7 firing cycles, value showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) and 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was revealed between 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.053). While chroma showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.001), while hue showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was found between 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.11) and 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.148). Translucency parameters revealed a significant difference (P=0.001) between different firing cycles with different thickness. Flexural strength showed no significant decrease with increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 firing cycles in the same 1 mm thickness (P=0.153) and showed significant decrease on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.005). While in 1.5 mm thickness showed significant decrease in flexural strength on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 cycles (P=0.013) and from 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and showed no significant decrease on increasing firing cycles from 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.073). While in 2 mm thickness showed significant decrease in flexural strength on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 cycles (P=0.015), 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.03). Conclusions: 1Translucency decreased on increasing the firing cycles and increasing the veneering thickness. 2Flexural strength increased on increasing veneering thickness and decreased on increasing the firing cycles.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate effect of veneering thickness and repeated firing on the flexural strength and translucency of lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Materials and methods: Sixty-three-disc specimens were divided; each group have 21 discs specimens. First group was lithium disilicate core 1 mm with no veneering coverage, second group the lithium disilicate core was veneered by 0.5 mm nano flouroapatite glass ceramic. Third group was lithium disilicate core veneered by 1 mm nano flouroapatite glass ceramic. Each group was subjected to repeated firing cycles (3, 5, 7). Seven-disc specimens for each firing cycle were used to measure translucency then flexural strength. The degree of color difference between the compared colors was expressed in ∆E units. The total color difference, according to L*, H*, C* coordinates, was calculated. Then change in TP (∆TP) which is the difference between first and second sample regarding thickness and firing cycles was measured to determine the acceptability threshold. Then fracture load was applied to all specimens fixed on 3 balls fixture under static compressive loading using universal testing machine to determine the flexural strength. The results were tabulated and statistical analysis was performedusing repeated way ANOVA method. Results: Regarding value, chroma and hue, in 3 firing cycles value means revealed a significant difference in the comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) thickness and between 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was shown between 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.325). While chroma and hue showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.001). However, in 5 firing cycles, value showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) and also between 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.016), and chroma also showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001), and hue showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.027), and also between 1 mm, 2 mm and 1.5 mm, 2 mm. However, in 7 firing cycles, value showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) and 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was revealed between 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.053). While chroma showed significant difference between 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm (P=0.001), while hue showed significant difference in comparison between 1 mm, 1.5 mm (P=0.001) but non-significant difference was found between 1 mm, 2 mm (P=0.11) and 1.5 mm, 2 mm (P=0.148). Translucency parameters revealed a significant difference (P=0.001) between different firing cycles with different thickness. Flexural strength showed no significant decrease with increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 firing cycles in the same 1 mm thickness (P=0.153) and showed significant decrease on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.005). While in 1.5 mm thickness showed significant decrease in flexural strength on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 cycles (P=0.013) and from 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and showed no significant decrease on increasing firing cycles from 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.073). While in 2 mm thickness showed significant decrease in flexural strength on increasing firing cycles from 3 to 5 cycles (P=0.015), 3 to 7 cycles (P=0.001) and 5 to 7 cycles (P=0.03). Conclusions: 1Translucency decreased on increasing the firing cycles and increasing the veneering thickness. 2Flexural strength increased on increasing veneering thickness and decreased on increasing the firing cycles.
贴面厚度和重复烧成对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷抗弯强度和透光性的影响
目的:评价贴面厚度和重复烧制对二硅酸锂玻璃陶瓷抗弯强度和透光性的影响。材料与方法:分为63个椎间盘标本;每组标本21个。第一组为1 mm的二硅酸锂芯,无贴面覆盖,第二组为0.5 mm纳米氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷贴面。第三组为二硅酸锂芯,贴面为1mm纳米氟磷灰石玻璃陶瓷。每组均进行重复射击循环(3,5,7)。每个射击循环使用七个圆盘标本来测量半透明性和弯曲强度。比较颜色之间的色差程度以∆E单位表示。根据L*, H*, C*坐标计算总色差。然后测量TP(∆TP)的变化,即第一个和第二个样品在厚度和发射周期方面的差异,以确定可接受阈值。然后用万能试验机对所有固定在3球夹具上的试件施加静压缩载荷作用下的断裂载荷,测定试件的抗弯强度。将结果制成表格,采用重复方差分析方法进行统计分析。结果:在值、色度和色调方面,在3个放电周期中,1 mm、1.5 mm (P=0.001)厚度和1 mm、2 mm (P=0.001)厚度之间的值均值有显著差异,而1.5 mm和2 mm之间的值均值无显著差异(P=0.325)。而色度和色相在1 mm、1.5 mm和2 mm之间存在显著差异(P=0.001)。然而,在5个烧制周期中,数值在1mm、1.5 mm和1mm、2mm之间存在显著差异(P=0.001),在1.5 mm、2mm之间也存在显著差异(P=0.016),色度在1mm、1.5 mm、2mm之间也存在显著差异(P=0.001),色相在1mm、1.5 mm和1.5 mm、2mm之间也存在显著差异(P=0.027)。然而,在7个射击周期中,1 mm、1.5 mm与1 mm、2 mm之间的数值差异有统计学意义(P=0.001),而1.5 mm、2 mm之间的数值差异无统计学意义(P=0.053)。色度在1 mm、1.5 mm和2 mm之间有显著性差异(P=0.001),色相在1 mm、1.5 mm之间有显著性差异(P=0.001),而在1 mm、2 mm和1.5 mm、2 mm之间无显著性差异(P=0.11)。不同发射周期、不同厚度的半透光性参数差异显著(P=0.001)。在相同的1 mm厚度下,3 ~ 5次射击次数增加时,抗折强度无显著降低(P=0.153), 3 ~ 7次射击次数增加时,抗折强度有显著降低(P=0.001), 5 ~ 7次射击次数增加时,抗折强度有显著降低(P=0.005)。而在1.5 mm厚度下,从3 ~ 5次循环和从3 ~ 7次循环,弯曲强度显著降低(P=0.013),从5 ~ 7次循环,弯曲强度无显著降低(P=0.073)。而在2mm厚度下,随着烧制周期从3 ~ 5次(P=0.015)、3 ~ 7次(P=0.001)和5 ~ 7次(P=0.03)的增加,弯曲强度显著降低。结论:1 .随着烧制次数的增加和贴面厚度的增加,半透明性降低。抗折强度随单板厚度的增加而增加,随烧成次数的增加而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信