A Review of SQL vs NoSQL Database for Nuclear Reactor Digital Twin Applications: With Example MongoDB Based NoSQL Database for Digital Twin Model of a Pressurized-Water-Reactor Steam-Generator

S. Mohanty, T. Elmer, S. Bakhtiari, R. Vilim
{"title":"A Review of SQL vs NoSQL Database for Nuclear Reactor Digital Twin Applications: With Example MongoDB Based NoSQL Database for Digital Twin Model of a Pressurized-Water-Reactor Steam-Generator","authors":"S. Mohanty, T. Elmer, S. Bakhtiari, R. Vilim","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-73153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this paper a summary of the differences between structured query language (SQL) based traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) and recently popular NoSQL based database are presented. The importance of selecting a NoSQL database for the implementation of digital Twin (DT) framework for nuclear reactor predictive maintenance has been discussed. Example of commercially available MongoDB based NoSQL database implementation with storing data from various sources: such as from virtual time-series temperature measurements (based on finite element-based heat transfer models) at thousands of nodal locations and from real sensor measurements (from continuous online monitoring based active ultrasonic sensors and from non-continuous nondestructive testing (NDT) based eddy current measurements is demonstrated.","PeriodicalId":146533,"journal":{"name":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 13: Safety Engineering, Risk, and Reliability Analysis; Research Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-73153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper a summary of the differences between structured query language (SQL) based traditional relational database management systems (RDBMS) and recently popular NoSQL based database are presented. The importance of selecting a NoSQL database for the implementation of digital Twin (DT) framework for nuclear reactor predictive maintenance has been discussed. Example of commercially available MongoDB based NoSQL database implementation with storing data from various sources: such as from virtual time-series temperature measurements (based on finite element-based heat transfer models) at thousands of nodal locations and from real sensor measurements (from continuous online monitoring based active ultrasonic sensors and from non-continuous nondestructive testing (NDT) based eddy current measurements is demonstrated.
SQL与NoSQL数据库在核反应堆数字孪生模型中的应用综述——以基于MongoDB的NoSQL数据库在压水堆蒸汽发生器数字孪生模型中的应用为例
本文概述了基于结构化查询语言(SQL)的传统关系数据库管理系统(RDBMS)与最近流行的基于NoSQL的数据库之间的区别。讨论了在核反应堆预测维护中选择NoSQL数据库实现数字孪生(DT)框架的重要性。商业上可用的基于MongoDB的NoSQL数据库实现示例,存储来自各种来源的数据:例如来自数千个节点位置的虚拟时间序列温度测量(基于基于有限元的传热模型)和来自真实传感器测量(来自基于主动超声波传感器的连续在线监测和基于非连续无损检测(NDT)的涡流测量)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信