Fire risk assessment in selected commercial buildings in Mashhad based on NFPA 101 standard in 2018

Amir Kermani Hesarshahabi, R. Mirzaei, R. Gholamnia
{"title":"Fire risk assessment in selected commercial buildings in Mashhad based on NFPA 101 standard in 2018","authors":"Amir Kermani Hesarshahabi, R. Mirzaei, R. Gholamnia","doi":"10.52547/jorar.11.3.184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Fires in residential buildings, commercial complexes, and small and large industries cause a lot of financial, human, and environmental damage in different communities annually. This study is conducted with the aim to evaluate the fire risk in the selected commercial buildings in Mashhad, Iran. METHODS: This was a descriptive-cross-sectional and applied study conducted in the spring of 2019 on 10 separate commercial buildings in Mashhad. First, the necessary checklists for fire risk assessment from the NFPA 101 standard were prepared and compiled by the researcher, and the necessary information was completed according to the field surveys and obtaining the urban planning documents of the buildings. The information collected was then analyzed in the Computerized Fire Safety Evaluation System (CFSES) software for final evaluation of the buildings. FINDINGS: In general, the total number of commercial buildings examined (10 cases) was in an unacceptable condition in all three areas of fire risk, including the fire control, exit, and general safety aspects. In addition, the fire risk situation in older buildings (5 cases) was worse than in new buildings (5 cases). CONCLUSION: The fire risk assessment score of the commercial buildings studied in terms of fire control, exit route, and general safety aspects was unacceptable and none of the buildings evaluated obtained the minimum safety score in these three aspects. Therefore, to improve fire safety in commercial buildings, valid fire safety regulations and standards, including NFPA 101, must be observed to prevent fire accidents and irreparable financial and human losses.","PeriodicalId":137497,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rescue Relief","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rescue Relief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/jorar.11.3.184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Fires in residential buildings, commercial complexes, and small and large industries cause a lot of financial, human, and environmental damage in different communities annually. This study is conducted with the aim to evaluate the fire risk in the selected commercial buildings in Mashhad, Iran. METHODS: This was a descriptive-cross-sectional and applied study conducted in the spring of 2019 on 10 separate commercial buildings in Mashhad. First, the necessary checklists for fire risk assessment from the NFPA 101 standard were prepared and compiled by the researcher, and the necessary information was completed according to the field surveys and obtaining the urban planning documents of the buildings. The information collected was then analyzed in the Computerized Fire Safety Evaluation System (CFSES) software for final evaluation of the buildings. FINDINGS: In general, the total number of commercial buildings examined (10 cases) was in an unacceptable condition in all three areas of fire risk, including the fire control, exit, and general safety aspects. In addition, the fire risk situation in older buildings (5 cases) was worse than in new buildings (5 cases). CONCLUSION: The fire risk assessment score of the commercial buildings studied in terms of fire control, exit route, and general safety aspects was unacceptable and none of the buildings evaluated obtained the minimum safety score in these three aspects. Therefore, to improve fire safety in commercial buildings, valid fire safety regulations and standards, including NFPA 101, must be observed to prevent fire accidents and irreparable financial and human losses.
2018年基于NFPA 101标准的马什哈德部分商业建筑火灾风险评估
导读:住宅楼、商业综合体以及大大小小的工业火灾每年都会给不同的社区造成大量的经济、人员和环境损失。本研究旨在评估伊朗马什哈德选定的商业建筑的火灾风险。方法:这是一项描述性横断面和应用研究,于2019年春季对马什哈德的10个独立商业建筑进行。首先,研究人员根据NFPA 101标准编制了必要的火灾风险评估清单,并根据实地调查和获取建筑的城市规划文件完成了必要的信息。收集到的信息随后在计算机消防安全评估系统(CFSES)软件中进行分析,以对建筑物进行最终评估。结果:总的来说,被检查的商业建筑总数(10个案例)在所有三个火灾风险领域都处于不可接受的状态,包括消防控制、出口和一般安全方面。此外,旧建筑(5例)的火灾危险情况比新建筑(5例)更严重。结论:所研究的商业建筑在消防、出口通道和一般安全三个方面的火灾风险评估得分均不合格,没有一栋建筑在这三个方面的安全得分达到最低。因此,为了提高商业建筑的消防安全,必须遵守有效的消防安全法规和标准,包括NFPA 101,以防止火灾事故和不可挽回的财产和人员损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信