The New Aarhus Regulation and the Defensive Behaviour of the European Legislator

Luca de Lucia
{"title":"The New Aarhus Regulation and the Defensive Behaviour of the European Legislator","authors":"Luca de Lucia","doi":"10.7590/187479822x16589299241736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union implemented the Aarhus Convention for European institutions and bodies by means of Regulation 1367/2006. This Regulation, however, did not ensure the full compliance of European law with the Convention provisions regarding access to justice, since it was very restrictive\n as to who was granted the right to request the review of acts allegedly infringing environmental law, the acts for which such review could be requested, and access to justice was ensured through an administrative procedure that did not comply with the principle of fairness. Due to these shortcomings,\n Regulation 2021/1767 amended Regulation 1367/2006, successfully addressing the first two compliance issues, but leaving the question of the fairness of the review mechanism unresolved. This article has two aims: first, to illustrate the main changes made by Regulation 2021/1767, and second,\n to show that the European legislator could provide for access to justice in environmental matters through review mechanisms that are fully in line with the standards required by the Aarhus Convention. This would be possible given that the provisions of the Treaty on administrative remedies\n are fairly flexible.","PeriodicalId":294114,"journal":{"name":"Review of European Administrative Law","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of European Administrative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/187479822x16589299241736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Union implemented the Aarhus Convention for European institutions and bodies by means of Regulation 1367/2006. This Regulation, however, did not ensure the full compliance of European law with the Convention provisions regarding access to justice, since it was very restrictive as to who was granted the right to request the review of acts allegedly infringing environmental law, the acts for which such review could be requested, and access to justice was ensured through an administrative procedure that did not comply with the principle of fairness. Due to these shortcomings, Regulation 2021/1767 amended Regulation 1367/2006, successfully addressing the first two compliance issues, but leaving the question of the fairness of the review mechanism unresolved. This article has two aims: first, to illustrate the main changes made by Regulation 2021/1767, and second, to show that the European legislator could provide for access to justice in environmental matters through review mechanisms that are fully in line with the standards required by the Aarhus Convention. This would be possible given that the provisions of the Treaty on administrative remedies are fairly flexible.
《新奥胡斯条例》与欧洲立法者的防卫行为
欧盟通过第1367/2006号条例为欧洲机构和机构实施了《奥胡斯公约》。然而,这一条例并没有确保欧洲法律完全遵守《公约》关于诉诸司法的规定,因为对于谁有权要求审查据称违反环境法的行为、可以要求进行这种审查的行为、以及通过不符合公平原则的行政程序确保诉诸司法都有非常严格的规定。由于这些缺点,第2021/1767号条例修订了第1367/2006号条例,成功地解决了前两个合规问题,但没有解决审查机制的公平性问题。本文有两个目的:首先,说明第2021/1767号条例所作的主要变化,其次,表明欧洲立法者可以通过完全符合《奥胡斯公约》要求的标准的审查机制,在环境问题上提供诉诸司法的机会。这是可能的,因为《条约》关于行政补救的规定相当灵活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信