Overheidsfinanciering voor geloofsgemeenschappen in de Straatsburgse jurisprudentie

A. Overbeeke, G. V. D. Schyff
{"title":"Overheidsfinanciering voor geloofsgemeenschappen in de Straatsburgse jurisprudentie","authors":"A. Overbeeke, G. V. D. Schyff","doi":"10.7590/ntkr_2018_003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extensive analysis of the impact of the ECHR on religion and state model thinking in the Council of Europe when it comes to restricting foreign funding for national religious organisations. The Turkish situation is used, distilling principles from the applicable case law of the ECtHR with which to analyse the Dutch situation - coming to conclusion that while the Turkish case was born of the wish to limit 'state religion', its application to the Dutch situation allows reason to allow the foreign funding of 'state religion' to be sustained.","PeriodicalId":122862,"journal":{"name":"NTKR Tijdschrift voor Recht en Religie","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NTKR Tijdschrift voor Recht en Religie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7590/ntkr_2018_003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Extensive analysis of the impact of the ECHR on religion and state model thinking in the Council of Europe when it comes to restricting foreign funding for national religious organisations. The Turkish situation is used, distilling principles from the applicable case law of the ECtHR with which to analyse the Dutch situation - coming to conclusion that while the Turkish case was born of the wish to limit 'state religion', its application to the Dutch situation allows reason to allow the foreign funding of 'state religion' to be sustained.
斯特拉斯堡判例法中宗教团体的公共资金
广泛分析《欧洲人权公约》对宗教的影响,以及欧洲委员会在限制国家宗教组织的外国资金方面的国家模式思维。土耳其的情况被使用,从欧洲人权法院适用的判例法中提取原则来分析荷兰的情况-得出结论,尽管土耳其的情况产生于限制“国教”的愿望,但将其应用于荷兰的情况允许理由允许“国教”的外国资助得以维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信