Diagnostic Value of Widal Test in the Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever: A Systematic Review

H. M. Mengist, K. Tilahun
{"title":"Diagnostic Value of Widal Test in the Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever: A Systematic Review","authors":"H. M. Mengist, K. Tilahun","doi":"10.4172/2161-0703.1000248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Typhoid fever the common cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the developing countries where Widal test is routinely used as diagnostic tool to rule out the disease. The diagnostic ability of Widal test is debatable as the test method has a low sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). Therefore, reviewing articles across the world regarding the diagnostic value of Widal test is necessary. \nMethods: Systematic review of published articles regarding the diagnostic value of Widal test to rule out typhoid fever was carried out. Published articles were identified from PubMed, Google scholar, HINARI and other sources. The mean, median, percentile and standard deviation of sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of the reviewed articles were computed by SPSS software version 24. \nResults: A total of 16 articles were included in the systematic review with the oldest publication in the year 1994 and the recent in 2015. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Widal test was 73.5%, 75.7%, 60% and 75.2%, respectively. \nConclusion: The systematic review results show that the reliability of Widal test is comparatively poor. Therefore, Widal test should not be used as a diagnostic tool to rule out typhoid fever unless supported by invasive clinical pictures and other confirmatory tests.","PeriodicalId":269971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

Introduction: Typhoid fever the common cause of morbidity and mortality especially in the developing countries where Widal test is routinely used as diagnostic tool to rule out the disease. The diagnostic ability of Widal test is debatable as the test method has a low sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV). Therefore, reviewing articles across the world regarding the diagnostic value of Widal test is necessary. Methods: Systematic review of published articles regarding the diagnostic value of Widal test to rule out typhoid fever was carried out. Published articles were identified from PubMed, Google scholar, HINARI and other sources. The mean, median, percentile and standard deviation of sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV of the reviewed articles were computed by SPSS software version 24. Results: A total of 16 articles were included in the systematic review with the oldest publication in the year 1994 and the recent in 2015. The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Widal test was 73.5%, 75.7%, 60% and 75.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The systematic review results show that the reliability of Widal test is comparatively poor. Therefore, Widal test should not be used as a diagnostic tool to rule out typhoid fever unless supported by invasive clinical pictures and other confirmatory tests.
维达尔试验在伤寒诊断中的诊断价值:系统综述
简介:伤寒是发病率和死亡率的常见原因,特别是在发展中国家,维达尔试验被常规用作诊断工具以排除该疾病。由于维达尔试验的敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值较低,其诊断能力尚存争议。因此,回顾国际上关于维达尔试验诊断价值的文章是必要的。方法:对已发表的有关维达尔试验对伤寒诊断价值的文献进行系统复习。发表的文章来自PubMed、Google scholar、HINARI和其他来源。采用SPSS软件进行敏感性、特异性、NPV和PPV的均值、中位数、百分位数和标准差计算。结果:系统评价共纳入16篇文献,最早发表时间为1994年,最近发表时间为2015年。Widal试验的平均敏感性为73.5%,特异度为75.7%,阳性预测值为60%,阴性预测值为75.2%。结论:系统评价结果显示,Widal检验的信度较差。因此,除非有侵入性临床图片和其他证实性检查的支持,否则不应将维达尔试验作为排除伤寒的诊断工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信