Do chewing simulators influence the test results of dental materials? Systematic review

Orlando Santiago, M. Ferreira, R. Huebner
{"title":"Do chewing simulators influence the test results of dental materials? Systematic review","authors":"Orlando Santiago, M. Ferreira, R. Huebner","doi":"10.21595/jfocg.2023.23270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Investigate whether different results about the physical properties of the same biomaterial frequently found in the literature are due to chewing simulator deficiency. A literature review was performed by searching for data on indicators of test accuracy, reproducibility, maintenance of test parameters during all experiments, and standards in the articles or in the sites of manufacturers. The database searched was CAPES PORTAL, and the keywords used were “bite force” AND “simulator”, “chewing simulator” and “mastication simulator”. Including criteria for the papers are publication filter date of “January 1, 2016”, articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese language were accepted. The first 100 papers that seemed suitable when considering the title and abstract were recovered. Only one simulator used for food property studies had the parameters searched. In the customized simulators for biomaterial properties, only one showed standards, and 8 showed all other parameters searched. All manufactured simulators showed all parameters searched, and only two manufactures did not show standards. Based on the data obtained, the disparate results of experiments with dental materials appeared to be more related to the test conditions than to the testing machines. Knowledge Transfer Statement The findings of the current review suggest that the chewing simulators used in preclinical research are reliable, bringing safety to restorative processes regarding the material. Any difference in preclinical investigations about dental material physical properties is due to test conditions other than chewing simulators.","PeriodicalId":330655,"journal":{"name":"Jaw Functional Orthopedics and Craniofacial Growth","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jaw Functional Orthopedics and Craniofacial Growth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21595/jfocg.2023.23270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Investigate whether different results about the physical properties of the same biomaterial frequently found in the literature are due to chewing simulator deficiency. A literature review was performed by searching for data on indicators of test accuracy, reproducibility, maintenance of test parameters during all experiments, and standards in the articles or in the sites of manufacturers. The database searched was CAPES PORTAL, and the keywords used were “bite force” AND “simulator”, “chewing simulator” and “mastication simulator”. Including criteria for the papers are publication filter date of “January 1, 2016”, articles in English, Spanish and Portuguese language were accepted. The first 100 papers that seemed suitable when considering the title and abstract were recovered. Only one simulator used for food property studies had the parameters searched. In the customized simulators for biomaterial properties, only one showed standards, and 8 showed all other parameters searched. All manufactured simulators showed all parameters searched, and only two manufactures did not show standards. Based on the data obtained, the disparate results of experiments with dental materials appeared to be more related to the test conditions than to the testing machines. Knowledge Transfer Statement The findings of the current review suggest that the chewing simulators used in preclinical research are reliable, bringing safety to restorative processes regarding the material. Any difference in preclinical investigations about dental material physical properties is due to test conditions other than chewing simulators.
咀嚼模拟器会影响牙齿材料的测试结果吗?系统综述
研究文献中经常发现的同一种生物材料的物理性质的不同结果是否由于咀嚼模拟器的缺乏。通过检索所有实验中测试准确性、可重复性、测试参数的维护以及文章或制造商现场的标准指标的数据,进行文献综述。检索数据库为CAPES PORTAL,关键词为“咬合力”和“模拟器”、“咀嚼模拟器”和“咀嚼模拟器”。包括论文的标准是发表筛选日期为“2016年1月1日”,接受英语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语的文章。在考虑标题和摘要时似乎合适的前100篇论文被恢复。只有一个用于食品特性研究的模拟器搜索了参数。在生物材料特性定制模拟器中,只有1个显示标准,8个显示所有其他搜索参数。所有制造的模拟器都显示了搜索到的所有参数,只有两家制造的模拟器没有显示标准。根据所获得的数据,牙科材料实验的不同结果似乎更多地与测试条件有关,而不是与测试机器有关。目前的研究结果表明,临床前研究中使用的咀嚼模拟器是可靠的,为材料的修复过程带来了安全性。临床前研究中关于牙科材料物理特性的任何差异都是由于咀嚼模拟器以外的测试条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信