Perceptions of Espoused Versus Enacted Culture Around Sexual Misconduct and Other Offenses Among U.S. Military Service Members

Jeffrey W. Lucas, P. Hanges, Kelly Beavan, Jordan Epistola, Emily Forgo, Debra L. Shapiro
{"title":"Perceptions of Espoused Versus Enacted Culture Around Sexual Misconduct and Other Offenses Among U.S. Military Service Members","authors":"Jeffrey W. Lucas, P. Hanges, Kelly Beavan, Jordan Epistola, Emily Forgo, Debra L. Shapiro","doi":"10.1177/0095327x231153434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interviews and focus groups with active-duty U.S. military service members and students at military service academies investigated relationships between espoused and enacted culture in perceptions of sexual assault and harassment versus other types of offenses. Results show that participants widely understood and accepted an espoused culture that is intolerant of sexual misconduct. The enacted culture included tolerance of some forms of sexual misconduct, differences in conduct in private versus public settings, and widespread resentment of frequent trainings. Results also showed cynicism about service treatments for all types of offenses, but especially for sexual misconduct. Of note is that participants tended to perceive inconsistencies in consequences for sexual misconduct in terms of who faced punishment, whereas for other offenses, they tended to see inconsistencies in what types of consequences were administered. Results demonstrate the value of efforts to align trainings with cultures that consistently discourage behaviors trainings are designed to eliminate.","PeriodicalId":130147,"journal":{"name":"Armed Forces & Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Armed Forces & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327x231153434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interviews and focus groups with active-duty U.S. military service members and students at military service academies investigated relationships between espoused and enacted culture in perceptions of sexual assault and harassment versus other types of offenses. Results show that participants widely understood and accepted an espoused culture that is intolerant of sexual misconduct. The enacted culture included tolerance of some forms of sexual misconduct, differences in conduct in private versus public settings, and widespread resentment of frequent trainings. Results also showed cynicism about service treatments for all types of offenses, but especially for sexual misconduct. Of note is that participants tended to perceive inconsistencies in consequences for sexual misconduct in terms of who faced punishment, whereas for other offenses, they tended to see inconsistencies in what types of consequences were administered. Results demonstrate the value of efforts to align trainings with cultures that consistently discourage behaviors trainings are designed to eliminate.
美国军人对性行为不端和其他犯罪行为的认可与制定文化的看法
对美国现役军人和军校学生的访谈和焦点小组调查了在性侵犯和性骚扰与其他类型犯罪的认知方面,拥护文化和制定文化之间的关系。结果表明,参与者广泛理解并接受了一种不容忍性行为不端的文化。制定的文化包括容忍某些形式的不当性行为,在私人和公共场合的行为差异,以及对频繁培训的普遍不满。调查结果还显示,对所有类型的犯罪行为,尤其是性行为不端行为的服务处理持怀疑态度。值得注意的是,参与者倾向于认为性行为不端的后果在谁受到惩罚方面是不一致的,而对于其他犯罪,他们倾向于认为惩罚的类型是不一致的。结果表明,将培训与文化相结合的努力是有价值的,这些文化一直阻碍着培训旨在消除的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信