The Ambiguity of Using the Statement of Absolute Responsibility Based on Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019: Study in Dharmasraya Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia

N. Nofialdi, Elimartati Elimartati, S. Iska, Deri Rizal, F. Firdaus, Kasmidin Kasmidin, Hamdani Hamdani
{"title":"The Ambiguity of Using the Statement of Absolute Responsibility Based on Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019: Study in Dharmasraya Regency, West Sumatra Province, Indonesia","authors":"N. Nofialdi, Elimartati Elimartati, S. Iska, Deri Rizal, F. Firdaus, Kasmidin Kasmidin, Hamdani Hamdani","doi":"10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Marriages are required to be registered under the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974, specifically Article 2. This registration plays a crucial role in establishing the legality of marriages and enables the utilization of different associated benefits. Meanwhile, unregistered marriages give rise to a range of legal issues, including uncertainties regarding lineage, concerns related to maintenance, and inheritance rights. In line with the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019 regarding Population Administration, couples involved have the option to obtain important documents such as the Population Identification Card (KTP), Birth Certificate, and Family Card (KK) by signing a Statement of Absolute Responsibility (SPTJM). This situation raises significant concerns regarding the legal implications of unregistered marriages. Therefore, this study aimed to employ an empirical legal approach with qualitative methods and obtained data through interviews, observations, and documentation. The data analysis used Miles and Huberman's method to uncover the meaning within Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019 regarding Unregistered Marriages and unveiled the ambiguity in understanding the true meaning. Furthermore, a study conducted in Dharmasraya Regency in 2021 discovered the issuance of 69,144 Family Cards by the Directorate General of Population and Civil Registration, and 22,453 (32.47%) were unregistered marriages. Only 194 individuals applied for validation (isbat) within 3 years, where 101, 27, and 66 were accepted, rejected, and revoked, respectively. In conclusion, the community perceived their marriages to be legal due to the issuance of Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019, even though the SPTJM did not legalize the concept or hold legal authority over the consequences.","PeriodicalId":366373,"journal":{"name":"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Marriages are required to be registered under the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974, specifically Article 2. This registration plays a crucial role in establishing the legality of marriages and enables the utilization of different associated benefits. Meanwhile, unregistered marriages give rise to a range of legal issues, including uncertainties regarding lineage, concerns related to maintenance, and inheritance rights. In line with the Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019 regarding Population Administration, couples involved have the option to obtain important documents such as the Population Identification Card (KTP), Birth Certificate, and Family Card (KK) by signing a Statement of Absolute Responsibility (SPTJM). This situation raises significant concerns regarding the legal implications of unregistered marriages. Therefore, this study aimed to employ an empirical legal approach with qualitative methods and obtained data through interviews, observations, and documentation. The data analysis used Miles and Huberman's method to uncover the meaning within Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019 regarding Unregistered Marriages and unveiled the ambiguity in understanding the true meaning. Furthermore, a study conducted in Dharmasraya Regency in 2021 discovered the issuance of 69,144 Family Cards by the Directorate General of Population and Civil Registration, and 22,453 (32.47%) were unregistered marriages. Only 194 individuals applied for validation (isbat) within 3 years, where 101, 27, and 66 were accepted, rejected, and revoked, respectively. In conclusion, the community perceived their marriages to be legal due to the issuance of Ministry of Home Affairs Regulation Number 109 of 2019, even though the SPTJM did not legalize the concept or hold legal authority over the consequences.
基于2019年内政部条例第109号的绝对责任声明使用的模糊性:在印度尼西亚西苏门答腊省Dharmasraya县的研究
根据1974年第1号法律的规定,特别是第2条,婚姻必须登记。这种登记在确立婚姻合法性方面起着至关重要的作用,并使人们能够利用各种相关的利益。与此同时,未登记婚姻会引发一系列法律问题,包括血统的不确定性、与抚养和继承权有关的问题。根据2019年内政部关于人口管理的第109号条例,相关夫妇可以通过签署绝对责任声明(SPTJM)来选择获得人口身份证(KTP),出生证明和家庭卡(KK)等重要文件。这种情况引起人们对未登记婚姻所涉法律问题的严重关切。因此,本研究旨在采用实证法律方法和定性方法,并通过访谈、观察和文献获取数据。数据分析使用迈尔斯和休伯曼的方法揭示了内政部2019年关于未登记婚姻的第109号条例中的含义,并揭示了对真实含义的理解的模糊性。此外,2021年在Dharmasraya县进行的一项研究发现,人口和民事登记总局签发了69,144张家庭卡,其中22,453张(32.47%)是未登记的婚姻。3年内只有194人申请验证(isbat),其中101人被接受,27人被拒绝,66人被撤销。总之,由于颁布了2019年内政部第109号条例,社区认为他们的婚姻是合法的,尽管防范酷刑委员会没有将这一概念合法化,也没有对其后果拥有法律权威。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信