HOW DOES A SMART CITY STRUCTURE ITS LABOR MARKET POLICY? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GLOBAL CITIES

N. Miyahira, Wilson Aparecido Costa de Amorim, Daielly Melina Nassif Mantovani
{"title":"HOW DOES A SMART CITY STRUCTURE ITS LABOR MARKET POLICY? A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GLOBAL CITIES","authors":"N. Miyahira, Wilson Aparecido Costa de Amorim, Daielly Melina Nassif Mantovani","doi":"10.33965/ama2020_202003c022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smart City is defined as a system of people interacting and using energies, materials, services and financing to catalyze economic development and improve the quality of life. Faced with such multidisciplinarity brought by the concept, there is concern about the efficiency of public management and, more specifically, the focus of this research: how public policies can influence the dynamics of the labor market, impacting on the creation and maintenance of a smart city. With the focus on labor market policies, this work is at the intersection of two research fields: smart city and public management. From the first field, we mean the evolution of the studies in smart city, the evaluative dimensions commonly used for a smart city, and it is understood that a city will only be smart if it uses technology with the main purpose of providing better living conditions for citizens, in this case, providing adequate working conditions. From the second field of study, the models experienced in public management are evolved, focusing on public policies on the labor market, so that it is possible to identify a smart city evaluative dimension in labor market policy: active policies and passive employment policies. The theoretical lens used in the research will be the institutional approach, since it allows analyzing how much the current configurations of given context, with its institutions guiding the human interactions, predispose formations more or less adherent to a model of smart city propitiating e-democracy or e-government. The contextual formatting to be analyzed will be different types of market economies found in each city under future analysis. This research is being developed to support a doctoral thesis that intend to realize comparative case studies of global cities (São Paulo and Shanghai). This article will present the bibliographic review, that is, the survey of the conceptual contribution that will guide future researches.","PeriodicalId":263215,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Applied Management Advances in the 21st Century 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/ama2020_202003c022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart City is defined as a system of people interacting and using energies, materials, services and financing to catalyze economic development and improve the quality of life. Faced with such multidisciplinarity brought by the concept, there is concern about the efficiency of public management and, more specifically, the focus of this research: how public policies can influence the dynamics of the labor market, impacting on the creation and maintenance of a smart city. With the focus on labor market policies, this work is at the intersection of two research fields: smart city and public management. From the first field, we mean the evolution of the studies in smart city, the evaluative dimensions commonly used for a smart city, and it is understood that a city will only be smart if it uses technology with the main purpose of providing better living conditions for citizens, in this case, providing adequate working conditions. From the second field of study, the models experienced in public management are evolved, focusing on public policies on the labor market, so that it is possible to identify a smart city evaluative dimension in labor market policy: active policies and passive employment policies. The theoretical lens used in the research will be the institutional approach, since it allows analyzing how much the current configurations of given context, with its institutions guiding the human interactions, predispose formations more or less adherent to a model of smart city propitiating e-democracy or e-government. The contextual formatting to be analyzed will be different types of market economies found in each city under future analysis. This research is being developed to support a doctoral thesis that intend to realize comparative case studies of global cities (São Paulo and Shanghai). This article will present the bibliographic review, that is, the survey of the conceptual contribution that will guide future researches.
智慧城市如何构建其劳动力市场政策?全球城市的比较研究
智慧城市被定义为人们互动和使用能源、材料、服务和融资的系统,以促进经济发展和提高生活质量。面对这一概念所带来的多学科性,人们关注公共管理的效率,更具体地说,这是本研究的重点:公共政策如何影响劳动力市场的动态,从而影响智慧城市的创建和维护。这项工作的重点是劳动力市场政策,是两个研究领域的交集:智慧城市和公共管理。从第一个领域来看,我们指的是智慧城市研究的演变,智能城市通常使用的评估维度,并且可以理解,如果一个城市使用技术的主要目的是为市民提供更好的生活条件,那么它将是智能的,在这种情况下,提供适当的工作条件。从第二个研究领域开始,对公共管理中经验丰富的模型进行了演化,重点关注劳动力市场的公共政策,从而有可能在劳动力市场政策中确定一个智慧城市的评估维度:主动政策和被动就业政策。研究中使用的理论视角将是制度方法,因为它允许分析给定背景下的当前配置,其制度指导人类互动,倾向于形成或多或少遵循智能城市模型的电子民主或电子政务。要分析的上下文格式将是在未来的分析中每个城市发现的不同类型的市场经济。这项研究是为了支持一篇博士论文,该论文旨在对全球城市(圣保罗和上海)进行比较案例研究。本文将提供文献回顾,即对概念贡献的概述,以指导未来的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信