FairMatch: A Graph-based Approach for Improving Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systems

M. Mansoury, Himan Abdollahpouri, Mykola Pechenizkiy, B. Mobasher, R. Burke
{"title":"FairMatch: A Graph-based Approach for Improving Aggregate Diversity in Recommender Systems","authors":"M. Mansoury, Himan Abdollahpouri, Mykola Pechenizkiy, B. Mobasher, R. Burke","doi":"10.1145/3340631.3394860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommender systems are often biased toward popular items. In other words, few items are frequently recommended while the majority of items do not get proportionate attention. That leads to low coverage of items in recommendation lists across users (i.e. low aggregate diversity) and unfair distribution of recommended items. In this paper, we introduce FairMatch, a general graph-based algorithm that works as a post-processing approach after recommendation generation for improving aggregate diversity. The algorithm iteratively finds items that are rarely recommended yet are high-quality and add them to the users' final recommendation lists. This is done by solving the maximum flow problem on the recommendation bipartite graph. While we focus on aggregate diversity and fair distribution of recommended items, the algorithm can be adapted to other recommendation scenarios using different underlying definitions of fairness. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improving aggregate diversity, provides comparable recommendation accuracy.","PeriodicalId":417607,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3340631.3394860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

Recommender systems are often biased toward popular items. In other words, few items are frequently recommended while the majority of items do not get proportionate attention. That leads to low coverage of items in recommendation lists across users (i.e. low aggregate diversity) and unfair distribution of recommended items. In this paper, we introduce FairMatch, a general graph-based algorithm that works as a post-processing approach after recommendation generation for improving aggregate diversity. The algorithm iteratively finds items that are rarely recommended yet are high-quality and add them to the users' final recommendation lists. This is done by solving the maximum flow problem on the recommendation bipartite graph. While we focus on aggregate diversity and fair distribution of recommended items, the algorithm can be adapted to other recommendation scenarios using different underlying definitions of fairness. A comprehensive set of experiments on two datasets and comparison with state-of-the-art baselines show that FairMatch, while significantly improving aggregate diversity, provides comparable recommendation accuracy.
公平匹配:一种基于图的提高推荐系统总体多样性的方法
推荐系统往往偏向于流行的项目。换句话说,很少有项目经常被推荐,而大多数项目没有得到相应的关注。这导致推荐列表中的项目在用户之间的低覆盖率(即低总多样性)和推荐项目的不公平分配。在本文中,我们介绍了FairMatch,这是一种通用的基于图的算法,作为推荐生成后的后处理方法,用于提高聚合多样性。该算法迭代地找到很少被推荐但质量高的项目,并将其添加到用户的最终推荐列表中。这是通过解决推荐二部图上的最大流量问题来实现的。虽然我们关注的是推荐项目的总体多样性和公平分配,但该算法可以使用不同的公平底层定义来适应其他推荐场景。在两个数据集上进行的一组综合实验以及与最新基线的比较表明,FairMatch在显著提高集合多样性的同时,提供了相当的推荐准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信