Morgenthau and the ethics of realism

Seán Molloy
{"title":"Morgenthau and the ethics of realism","authors":"Seán Molloy","doi":"10.4324/9781315725932-16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Molloy's chapter tackles the traditional, realist end of security studies. Instead of surveying this entire field, which would be a nigh-impossible task, Molloy opts to focus on one benchmark thinker, Hans J. Morgenthau. Molloy's intent is not to suggest that traditional or realist approaches can be reduced to Morgenthau. He is explicit that the traditional approach is a broad church that encompasses many different voices and contains many disagreements. This, he believes, is both a reflection of its vitality and a part of its charm. Molloy's rationale for focussing his analysis almost exclusively on Morgenthau is, rather, that he is indicative of the intersection between classical security studies and realist approaches to international relations, more generally.","PeriodicalId":372374,"journal":{"name":"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge Handbook of Ethics and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725932-16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Molloy's chapter tackles the traditional, realist end of security studies. Instead of surveying this entire field, which would be a nigh-impossible task, Molloy opts to focus on one benchmark thinker, Hans J. Morgenthau. Molloy's intent is not to suggest that traditional or realist approaches can be reduced to Morgenthau. He is explicit that the traditional approach is a broad church that encompasses many different voices and contains many disagreements. This, he believes, is both a reflection of its vitality and a part of its charm. Molloy's rationale for focussing his analysis almost exclusively on Morgenthau is, rather, that he is indicative of the intersection between classical security studies and realist approaches to international relations, more generally.
摩根索和现实主义伦理学
莫洛伊的这一章处理了安全研究中传统的、现实主义的问题。莫洛伊没有考察整个领域,这几乎是不可能完成的任务,而是选择关注一位标杆思想家,汉斯·j·摩根索。莫洛伊的意图并不是建议传统的或现实主义的方法可以简化为摩根索的方法。他明确表示,传统的方法是一个广泛的教会,包含许多不同的声音和许多分歧。他认为,这既是它的活力的反映,也是它的魅力的一部分。莫洛伊之所以把他的分析几乎完全集中在摩根索身上,更确切地说,是因为他表明了古典安全研究与更普遍的国际关系现实主义方法之间的交集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信