What is "Obamacare"?: health literacy, e-commerce, and the affordable care act's online content

Dawn S. Opel
{"title":"What is \"Obamacare\"?: health literacy, e-commerce, and the affordable care act's online content","authors":"Dawn S. Opel","doi":"10.1145/3230970.3230973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study audits and analyzes the online content provided by the U.S. government for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). In order to both educate Americans about the ACA and enroll those who needed insurance into plans offered by the U.S. and/or state governments, policy analysts, communication designers, and web developers at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) created and published a substantial array of online content. These policy statements, infographics, blog posts, videos, forms, and other resources were designed to engage the public and translate the complexities of the ACA into usable information for patients. However, a content audit and analysis of ACA-related online content reveals the ways that this content did not provide a navigational structure for patients newly insured (or already insured) to find them, as over time the e-commerce function of the site buried its educational purpose. From this analysis, designers of online public policy information will gain a better understanding of how to design as a part of a strategy to balance multiple, critical user roles and tasks.","PeriodicalId":191917,"journal":{"name":"Communication Design Quarterly","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Design Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3230970.3230973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study audits and analyzes the online content provided by the U.S. government for The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). In order to both educate Americans about the ACA and enroll those who needed insurance into plans offered by the U.S. and/or state governments, policy analysts, communication designers, and web developers at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) created and published a substantial array of online content. These policy statements, infographics, blog posts, videos, forms, and other resources were designed to engage the public and translate the complexities of the ACA into usable information for patients. However, a content audit and analysis of ACA-related online content reveals the ways that this content did not provide a navigational structure for patients newly insured (or already insured) to find them, as over time the e-commerce function of the site buried its educational purpose. From this analysis, designers of online public policy information will gain a better understanding of how to design as a part of a strategy to balance multiple, critical user roles and tasks.
什么是“奥巴马医改”?:健康知识、电子商务和平价医疗法案的在线内容
这项研究审核和分析了美国政府为《患者保护和平价医疗法案》(ACA)提供的在线内容。为了让美国人了解《平价医疗法案》,并让那些需要保险的人加入美国和/或州政府提供的计划,美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)和医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的政策分析师、沟通设计师和网络开发人员创建并发布了大量的在线内容。这些政策声明、信息图表、博客文章、视频、表格和其他资源旨在吸引公众,并将ACA的复杂性转化为患者可用的信息。然而,对aca相关在线内容的内容审计和分析显示,这些内容没有为新投保(或已经投保)的患者提供导航结构,因为随着时间的推移,该网站的电子商务功能掩盖了其教育目的。从这一分析中,在线公共政策信息的设计者将更好地理解如何将设计作为战略的一部分来平衡多个关键用户角色和任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信