Ideological dimensions in the 2016 elections

Kevin Cunningham, Johan A. Elkink
{"title":"Ideological dimensions in the 2016 elections","authors":"Kevin Cunningham, Johan A. Elkink","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526122643.003.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter evaluates the extent to which ideology may now matter more in Irish elections than before. It does so by analysing the relationship between the ideological positions of parties and vote choice, and by developing a dimensional mapping of ideological space based on rankings in the mock ballots. The principal conclusion is that while it may still be the case that ideology does not play a lead role in Irish politics, perhaps now it might be seen at least as ‘a supporting actor’. It remains the case that ideological positioning does not separate the two largest Irish parties, Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil; however, ideology does determine whether someone might vote for either or neither of these parties. On average Irish voters select parties that are ideologically close to them on a left-right scale, most prominently so for voters on the left of the spectrum where left vs. right does matter in their choice between parties. Overall, from a comparative perspective the Irish case may appear more conventional in terms of left-right competition than typically assumed; it also has an undercurrent of anti-globalisation that is similar to that found in other European states. ","PeriodicalId":439961,"journal":{"name":"The post-crisis Irish voter","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The post-crisis Irish voter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526122643.003.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This chapter evaluates the extent to which ideology may now matter more in Irish elections than before. It does so by analysing the relationship between the ideological positions of parties and vote choice, and by developing a dimensional mapping of ideological space based on rankings in the mock ballots. The principal conclusion is that while it may still be the case that ideology does not play a lead role in Irish politics, perhaps now it might be seen at least as ‘a supporting actor’. It remains the case that ideological positioning does not separate the two largest Irish parties, Fine Gael and Fianna Fáil; however, ideology does determine whether someone might vote for either or neither of these parties. On average Irish voters select parties that are ideologically close to them on a left-right scale, most prominently so for voters on the left of the spectrum where left vs. right does matter in their choice between parties. Overall, from a comparative perspective the Irish case may appear more conventional in terms of left-right competition than typically assumed; it also has an undercurrent of anti-globalisation that is similar to that found in other European states. 
2016年大选中的意识形态维度
本章评估了意识形态在爱尔兰选举中比以前更重要的程度。它通过分析政党的意识形态立场与投票选择之间的关系,以及根据模拟投票的排名,绘制意识形态空间的维度图来做到这一点。主要结论是,尽管意识形态可能仍然没有在爱尔兰政治中发挥主导作用,但也许现在它至少可以被视为“配角”。意识形态定位并没有将爱尔兰最大的两个政党——统一党(Fine Gael)和共和党(Fianna)分开Fáil;然而,意识形态确实决定了人们是否会投票给这两个政党中的任何一个。平均而言,爱尔兰选民会选择在意识形态上与他们接近的政党,尤其是对左翼选民来说,他们在选择政党时,左倾与右倾确实很重要。总的来说,从比较的角度来看,爱尔兰的情况在左右竞争方面可能比通常认为的更为传统;它也有一股反全球化的暗流,这与其他欧洲国家的情况类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信