[Measurement and evaluation of fiber-like dust].

J Simecek, M Pulkrábek
{"title":"[Measurement and evaluation of fiber-like dust].","authors":"J Simecek,&nbsp;M Pulkrábek","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advantages and disadvantages of the estimation of the mass and number fibrous dusts concentrations are discussed. By using the reference phase contrast microscopic method (1) the data of interlaboratory comparative measurements of MMMF (man-made mineral fibres/density/f.mm-2) have been got and are presented. Total mass dust concentrations and number concentrations of MMMF and/or asbestos fibres are compared. The consequent measurements were made in the same time intervals and in the same workplaces. In conclusion both measuring methods are critically evaluated and their results are compared with the prescribed MAC-values. Presented results are of use when deciding what method with respect to the kind of fibrous dust and to the working operation should be chosen.</p>","PeriodicalId":76839,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete","volume":"37 3","pages":"109-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Hygiene und ihre Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advantages and disadvantages of the estimation of the mass and number fibrous dusts concentrations are discussed. By using the reference phase contrast microscopic method (1) the data of interlaboratory comparative measurements of MMMF (man-made mineral fibres/density/f.mm-2) have been got and are presented. Total mass dust concentrations and number concentrations of MMMF and/or asbestos fibres are compared. The consequent measurements were made in the same time intervals and in the same workplaces. In conclusion both measuring methods are critically evaluated and their results are compared with the prescribed MAC-values. Presented results are of use when deciding what method with respect to the kind of fibrous dust and to the working operation should be chosen.

[纤维状粉尘的测量与评价]。
讨论了纤维性粉尘浓度质量和数量估算方法的优缺点。采用参考相衬显微法(1)得到了人造矿物纤维(MMMF)密度/f.mm-2的实验室间对比测量数据。比较了MMMF和/或石棉纤维的总质量粉尘浓度和数量浓度。随后的测量是在相同的时间间隔和相同的工作场所进行的。总之,对两种测量方法都进行了严格的评估,并将其结果与规定的mac值进行了比较。给出的结果对于确定纤维粉尘的种类和工作操作应选择何种方法具有参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信