Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review

G. Kalus, M. Kuhrmann
{"title":"Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review","authors":"G. Kalus, M. Kuhrmann","doi":"10.1145/2486046.2486078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Independently from which software process was selected for a company or a project, the selected software process usually cannot be applied without any customization. Although the need to tailor a software process to specific project requirements seems to be widely accepted and unquestioned, the way of doing the tailoring remains unclear and is, therefore, often left to the expertise of process engineers or project managers. What are the criteria to be applied in the tailoring? What are dependencies between different criteria and how should certain criteria influence the software process? In this paper we investigate concrete tailoring criteria for the tailoring of software processes. To this end, we present a collection of 49 tailoring criteria as the outcomes of a systematic literature review. We further analyze the impact of the discovered tailoring criteria by relating them to a set of 20 exemplary tailoring actions, which affect the project-specific software process. Our outcomes show that the factors influencing the tailoring are well understood, however, the consequences of the criteria remain abstract and need to be interpreted on a project-per-project basis.","PeriodicalId":296714,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software and Systems Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2486046.2486078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

Independently from which software process was selected for a company or a project, the selected software process usually cannot be applied without any customization. Although the need to tailor a software process to specific project requirements seems to be widely accepted and unquestioned, the way of doing the tailoring remains unclear and is, therefore, often left to the expertise of process engineers or project managers. What are the criteria to be applied in the tailoring? What are dependencies between different criteria and how should certain criteria influence the software process? In this paper we investigate concrete tailoring criteria for the tailoring of software processes. To this end, we present a collection of 49 tailoring criteria as the outcomes of a systematic literature review. We further analyze the impact of the discovered tailoring criteria by relating them to a set of 20 exemplary tailoring actions, which affect the project-specific software process. Our outcomes show that the factors influencing the tailoring are well understood, however, the consequences of the criteria remain abstract and need to be interpreted on a project-per-project basis.
软件过程裁剪的标准:系统的评审
独立于为公司或项目选择的软件过程,所选择的软件过程通常不能在没有任何定制的情况下应用。尽管针对特定的项目需求定制软件过程的需求似乎被广泛接受并且毫无疑问,但是进行定制的方法仍然不清楚,因此,通常留给过程工程师或项目经理的专业知识。裁剪的标准是什么?不同标准之间的依赖关系是什么?某些标准应该如何影响软件过程?本文研究了软件过程裁剪的具体裁剪准则。为此,我们提出了49个裁剪标准的集合,作为系统文献综述的结果。我们进一步分析了发现的裁剪标准的影响,将它们与一组20个典型的裁剪操作联系起来,这些裁剪操作会影响特定于项目的软件过程。我们的结果表明,影响裁剪的因素被很好地理解了,然而,标准的结果仍然是抽象的,需要在每个项目的基础上解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信