The Chronicle about the Bishops of Rostov and “The Note about the Life” of Dimitry of Rostov

M. Fedotova
{"title":"The Chronicle about the Bishops of Rostov and “The Note about the Life” of Dimitry of Rostov","authors":"M. Fedotova","doi":"10.31860/2712-7591-2021-1-89-104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the first hagiographic work dedicated to St. Dimitry of Rostov — “The Note about the Life” of the saint. The “Note” is a part of the Chronicle about the Bishops of Rostov, compiled by Dimitry of Rostov himself. This means that the “Note” is based on an autobiographical text. Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, scribes made various additions and changes to the biographies of the bishops of Rostov and, as a result, several branches of the manuscript tradition of the Chronicle developed. The article describes and analyzes the changes in St. Dimitry’s biography in different redactions of the Chronicle. The most similarity to “The Note about the Life” of St. Dimitry is found in the redaction compiled by the Suzdalian priest Anania Fedorov in 1757. This redaction of the Chronicle is preserved in a single manuscript, now located in the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg (Titov collection, no. 3641). Probably the additional information about Dimitry of Rostov in the Chronicle by Anania Fedorov was taken from another, now lost, chronicle concerning the bishops of Rostov. However, the information about Dimitry from this source was used not only by Anania Fedorov: in 1756, even before Anania compiled his redaction of the Chronicle, Ambrose Sertis-Kamensky, then the archbishop of Pereslavl and Dmitrov, forwarded it to the Holy Synod upon request. In this way, the “Note” became a separate text. Moreover, it is the first hagiographic work about Dimitry of Rostov that was compiled before his official canonization and later acquired an abundant manuscript tradition.","PeriodicalId":426957,"journal":{"name":"Texts and History: Journal of Philological, Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texts and History: Journal of Philological, Historical and Cultural Texts and History Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31860/2712-7591-2021-1-89-104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the first hagiographic work dedicated to St. Dimitry of Rostov — “The Note about the Life” of the saint. The “Note” is a part of the Chronicle about the Bishops of Rostov, compiled by Dimitry of Rostov himself. This means that the “Note” is based on an autobiographical text. Throughout the 18th and 19th centuries, scribes made various additions and changes to the biographies of the bishops of Rostov and, as a result, several branches of the manuscript tradition of the Chronicle developed. The article describes and analyzes the changes in St. Dimitry’s biography in different redactions of the Chronicle. The most similarity to “The Note about the Life” of St. Dimitry is found in the redaction compiled by the Suzdalian priest Anania Fedorov in 1757. This redaction of the Chronicle is preserved in a single manuscript, now located in the National Library of Russia in St. Petersburg (Titov collection, no. 3641). Probably the additional information about Dimitry of Rostov in the Chronicle by Anania Fedorov was taken from another, now lost, chronicle concerning the bishops of Rostov. However, the information about Dimitry from this source was used not only by Anania Fedorov: in 1756, even before Anania compiled his redaction of the Chronicle, Ambrose Sertis-Kamensky, then the archbishop of Pereslavl and Dmitrov, forwarded it to the Holy Synod upon request. In this way, the “Note” became a separate text. Moreover, it is the first hagiographic work about Dimitry of Rostov that was compiled before his official canonization and later acquired an abundant manuscript tradition.
《罗斯托夫主教纪事》和《罗斯托夫德米特里生平札记》
本文讨论了献给罗斯托夫的圣迪米特里的第一部圣徒传记作品——“关于圣徒生活的笔记”。“笔记”是罗斯托夫的主教编年史的一部分,由罗斯托夫的迪米特里自己编写。这意味着“笔记”是基于一个自传体文本。在整个18世纪和19世纪,抄写员对罗斯托夫主教的传记进行了各种补充和修改,因此,《纪事报》的手稿传统发展了几个分支。本文描述并分析了《纪事报》不同版本中圣迪米特里传记的变化。与圣迪米特里的《生活札记》最相似的是由苏苏达连神父安娜尼亚·费多罗夫(Anania Fedorov)于1757年编辑的版本。编年史的这一修订版保存在一份手稿中,现藏于圣彼得堡的俄罗斯国家图书馆(Titov collection, no. 39)。3641)。阿娜尼亚·费多罗夫所著的编年史中关于罗斯托夫的迪米特里的补充资料,很可能是从另一本现已失传的关于罗斯托夫主教的编年史中摘取的。然而,来自这个来源的关于迪米特里的信息不仅被Anania Fedorov使用:在1756年,甚至在Anania编纂编年史之前,Ambrose Sertis-Kamensky,当时的Pereslavl和Dmitrov大主教,应要求将其转发给神圣的主教会议。这样,《笔记》就成了一个单独的文本。此外,这是第一部关于罗斯托夫的德米特里的圣徒作品,是在他被正式册封之前编写的,后来获得了丰富的手稿传统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信